SynthesisBMC women's health2022
Community-based non-pharmacological interventions for pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Positive psychology interventions during pregnancy: A systematic review.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2026Pooled it
- Educational films for improving perinatal outcomes associated with gestational diabetes in Uganda and India: a cluster randomised trial.BMJ global health · 2026Trial
- Effects of lifestyle education interventions on quality of life and fbg in women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2026Review
- Long-Term Effectiveness of a Mobile-Based Breastfeeding Program for Women with Gestational Diabetes: 6-Month Follow-Up of a Quasi-Experimental Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Women's health and maternal care services: seizing missed opportunities to prevent and manage preterm birth.Reproductive health · 2025Review
- Beyond one size fits all: Probing patient choices in gestational diabetes management, from screening to postpartum.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2025Review
- Self-care interventions among women with gestational diabetes mellitus in low and middle-income countries: a scoping review.Systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Article
- Personalized and Culturally Tailored Features of Mobile Apps for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Their Impact on Patient Self-Management: Scoping Review.JMIR diabetes · 2024Article
- Non-Pharmacological Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus with a High Fasting Glycemic Parameter: A Hospital-Based Study in Vietnam.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Development and Implementation of an Integrated Model of Perinatal Diabetes Education and Management to Improve Maternity Outcomes and Health Equity.Health equity · 2024Article
- Gestational diabetes mellitus and COVID-19: The epidemic during the pandemic.World journal of diabetes · 2023Review
- Effect of mobile-assisted education on health promoting lifestyle and blood sugar of women with gestational diabetes: a randomised controlled trial.BMJ nutrition, prevention & health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-pharmacological interventions are the first line of Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) management. Community-based interventions are cheaper, more accessible, with higher patient satisfaction.
objectivesTo systematically review community-based non-pharmacological interventions and evaluate their effectiveness for GDM. SEARCH STRATEGY: Twelve bibliographic databases and reference list of related studies from inception until January 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: All primary studies of community-based non-pharmacological interventions for GDM reported in English which investigated any behavioural or clinical outcome(s). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted using modified Cochrane's data extraction template. Studies were evaluated using Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Narrative synthesis was used to summarise findings. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021257634). MAIN
resultsTwenty-seven studies involving 6,242 pregnant women with GDM investigated self-management programmes, medical nutrition/diet therapy, exercise/physical activity, combined diet and exercise, calcium plus vitamin D supplementation, and continuous glucose monitoring. Self-management programmes were more effective than routine care in improving self-efficacy, two-hour postprandial blood glucose, and lifestyle behaviours but were as effective as routine care in improving infant birth weight. Self-management programmes were superior to or as effective as usual care in improving fasting blood glucose, blood glucose control, glycated haemoglobin, macrosomia, and preterm delivery. Medical nutrition/diet therapy was more effective than usual care in improving postprandial blood glucose levels. Postprandial blood glucose levels were better improved by regular supervised exercise plus daily brisk walks or a daily walking intervention than routine obstetric care or no treatment. The effects of exercise/physical activity programmes were mostly inconsistent for other outcomes. Diet and exercise were superior to diet alone in reducing maternal weight gain although there were similar outcomes for other pregnancy and foetal outcomes. Limited or conflicting evidence was found for other outcomes and interventions including calcium and vitamin D supplementation and continuous glucose monitoring intervention.
conclusionsCommunity-based non-pharmacological interventions are more effective than placebo; and are more or as effective as usual care. Self-management programmes and medical nutrition/diet therapy had the most promising GDM outcomes.
fundingThere was no funding for this study. The study design, data collection, data analysis and interpretation, and writing of this manuscript were not influenced externally by any funder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.