Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36447180›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022

Machine learning model identifies aggressive acute pancreatitis within 48 h of admission: a large retrospective study.

Lei Yuan, Mengyao Ji, Shuo Wang, Xinyu Wen, Pingxiao Huang, Lei Shen, Jun Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Acute pancreatitis: mechanisms and therapeutic approaches.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lei Yuan *School of Automation, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China.
Mengyao Ji *Department of Gastroenterology, Wuhan University Renmin Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Shuo Wang *Department of Gastroenterology, Wuhan University Renmin Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xinyu WenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Wuhan University Renmin Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Pingxiao HuangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Lei ShenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Wuhan University Renmin Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China. shenlei818@whu.edu.cn.
Jun XuSchool of Automation, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China. xujung@whu.edu.cn.
Wuhan University · CNRenmin Hospital of Wuhan University · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNNanjing University of Information Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute pancreatitis (AP) with critical illness is linked to increased morbidity and mortality. Current risk scores to identify high-risk AP patients have certain limitations.

objectiveTo develop and validate a machine learning tool within 48 h after admission for predicting which patients with AP will develop critical illness based on ubiquitously available clinical, laboratory, and radiologic variables.

methods5460 AP patients were enrolled. Clinical, laboratory, and imaging variables were collected within 48 h after hospital admission. Least Absolute Shrinkage Selection Operator with bootstrap method was employed to select the most informative variables. Five different machine learning models were constructed to predictive likelihood of critical illness, and the optimal model (APCU) was selected. External cohort was used to validate APCU. APCU and other risk scores were compared using multivariate analysis. Models were evaluated by area under the curve (AUC). The decision curve analysis was employed to evaluate the standardized net benefit.

resultsXgboost was constructed and selected as APCU, involving age, comorbid disease, mental status, pulmonary infiltrates, procalcitonin (PCT), neutrophil percentage (Neu%), ALT/AST, ratio of albumin and globulin, cholinesterase, Urea, Glu, AST and serum total cholesterol. The APCU performed excellently in discriminating AP risk in internal cohort (AUC = 0.95) and external cohort (AUC = 0.873). The APCU was significant for biliogenic AP (OR = 4.25 [2.08-8.72], P < 0.001), alcoholic AP (OR = 3.60 [1.67-7.72], P = 0.001), hyperlipidemic AP (OR = 2.63 [1.28-5.37], P = 0.008) and tumor AP (OR = 4.57 [2.14-9.72], P < 0.001). APCU yielded the highest clinical net benefit, comparatively.

conclusionMachine learning tool based on ubiquitously available clinical variables accurately predicts the development of AP, optimizing the management of AP.

Indexed as

PancreatitisAcute DiseaseCritical IllnessHumansMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesAcute pancreatitisIntensive care unitMachine learningXgboost

Identifiers

PMID36447180
PMCPMC9707001
OpenAlexW4310363145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.