Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36447162›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

Cardiovascular risk management: the success of target level achievement in high- and very high-risk patients in Hungary.

Zoltán Jancsó, Orsolya Csenteri, Gergő József Szőllősi, Péter Vajer, Péter Andréka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zoltán JancsóGottsegen National Cardiovascular Center, Haller u. 29, Budapest, 1096, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-0543-4476
Orsolya CsenteriGottsegen National Cardiovascular Center, Haller u. 29, Budapest, 1096, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-7302-7130
Gergő József SzőllősiGottsegen National Cardiovascular Center, Haller u. 29, Budapest, 1096, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-4126-0058
Péter VajerGottsegen National Cardiovascular Center, Haller u. 29, Budapest, 1096, Hungary. peter@vajer.hu.ORCID 0000-0002-3393-135X
Péter AndrékaGottsegen National Cardiovascular Center, Haller u. 29, Budapest, 1096, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-1487-8992

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of risk factors in patients with high cardiovascular risk and its effectiveness is of paramount importance. Over the last decade, several studies have examined the achievement of cardiovascular risk factors' target levels in Europe. In the present Hungarian study, we assessed the cardiovascular risk level of participants aged 40-65 years and the success of achieving risk factors' target levels in high- and very high-risk patients. We compared these results with the results of two similar European studies.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study involving 37,778 patients aged 40-65 years from Hungary between 2019 and 2020. Cardiovascular risk levels and target values were set according to the 2016 European Guideline. Target achievement was evaluated for body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure, total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol, triglyceride, and HbA1c (in diabetics).

resultsFor 37,298 patients, all the data were available to determine their cardiovascular risk category. Of these, 23.1% had high and 31.4% had very high cardiovascular risk (men: 27.1 and 39.6%, women: 20.5 and 26.1%, respectively). Achievement of the LDL-C target of 1.8 mmol/l was only 8.0% among very high-risk patients, which was significantly lower than the European average (29%). Achievement of target blood pressure among high-risk patients was better than the European average (63.4% vs. 44.7%, respectively); however, achievement was slightly lower among very high-risk patients compared with the European average (49.4% vs. 58%, respectively). The proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes who achieved a HbA1c below 7% was 57.3% in the high-risk population and 53% in the very high-risk population, which was in line with the European average success rates (58.5 and 54%, respectively). Waist circumference (< 88 cm for women and < 102 cm for men) was achieved by 29.4% of patients in the very high-risk group in our survey, which was lower than the European average of 41%.

conclusionsThe success rate of cardiovascular risk management in Hungary is lower than the European average in several parameters. Furthermore, our data highlight the poor effectiveness of obesity management in Hungary. General practice partnerships may be important sites for positive change.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGlycated HemoglobinHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansHungaryMaleRisk FactorsGlycated HemoglobinCardiovascular riskRisk managementTarget level achievement

Identifiers

PMID36447162
PMCPMC9706967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.