Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36447143›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022

Antepartum and intrapartum stillbirth rates across gestation: a cross-sectional study using the revised foetal death reporting system in the U.S.

Collette N Ncube, Sarah M McCormick, Sylvia E Badon, Taylor Riley, Vivienne L Souter

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Diagnostic evaluation to identify infection-attributable stillbirth.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Collette N NcubeDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University, School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02118, USA. ncube@bu.edu.
Sarah M McCormickDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maternal Fetal Medicine, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA, USA.
Sylvia E BadonKaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research, Oakland, CA, USA.
Taylor RileyDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Vivienne L SouterDepartment of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · USBoston University · USKaiser Permanente · USMadigan Army Medical Center · US

Funding

Understanding racial and ethnic disparities in preterm birth: a systems science approachK01MD013911 · NIMHD · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI NCUBE, COLLETTE N · 2019 to 2023
$688k
NIMHD NIH HHS K01 MD013911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a renewed call to address preventable foetal deaths in high-income countries, especially where progress has been slow. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released publicly, for the first time, the initiating cause and estimated timing of foetal deaths in 2014. The objective of this study is to describe risk and characteristics of antepartum versus intrapartum stillbirths in the U.S., and frequency of pathological examination to determine cause.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study of singleton births (24-43 weeks) using 2014 U.S. Fetal Death and Natality data available from the National Center for Health Statistics. The primary outcome was timing of death (antepartum (n = 6200), intrapartum (n = 453), and unknown (n = 5403)). Risk factors of interest included maternal sociodemographic, behavioural, medical and obstetric factors, along with foetal sex. We estimated gestational week-specific stillbirth hazard, risk factors for intrapartum versus antepartum stillbirth using multivariable log-binomial regression models, conditional probabilities of intrapartum and antepartum stillbirth at each gestational week, and frequency of pathological examination by timing of death.

resultsThe gestational age-specific stillbirth hazard was approximately 2 per 10,000 foetus-weeks among preterm gestations and > 3 per 10,000 foetus-weeks among term gestations. Both antepartum and intrapartum stillbirth risk increased in late-term and post-term gestations. The risk of intrapartum versus antepartum stillbirth was higher among those without a prior live birth, relative to those with at least one prior live birth (RR 1.32; 95% CI 1.08-1.61) and those with gestational hypertension, relative to those with no report of gestational hypertension (RR 1.47; 95% CI 1.09-1.96), and lower among Black, relative to white, individuals (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.55-0.89). Pathological examination was not performed/planned in 25% of known antepartum stillbirths and 29% of known intrapartum stillbirths.

conclusionThese findings suggest greater stillbirth risk in the late-term and post-term periods. Primiparous mothers had greater risk of intrapartum than antepartum still birth, suggesting the need for intrapartum interventions for primiparous mothers in this phase of pregnancy to prevent some intrapartum foetal deaths. Efforts are needed to improve understanding, prevention and investigation of foetal deaths as well as improve stillbirth data quality and completeness in the United States.

Indexed as

Hypertension, Pregnancy-InducedStillbirthCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornParturitionPregnancySex FactorsUnited StatesCause of deathFoetal deathIntrapartumParityRace factorsStillbirth

Identifiers

PMID36447143
PMCPMC9706921
OpenAlexW4310566390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.