Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36447082›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2022

Generation of synthetic ground glass nodules using generative adversarial networks (GANs).

Zhixiang Wang, Zhen Zhang, Ying Feng, Lizza E L Hendriks, Razvan L Miclea, Hester Gietema, Janna Schoenmaekers, Andre Dekker, Leonard Wee, Alberto Traverso

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhixiang Wang *Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4778-7539
Zhen Zhang *Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ying FengDepartment of Ultrasound, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Lizza E L HendriksDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Razvan L MicleaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hester GietemaDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Janna SchoenmaekersDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Andre DekkerDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Leonard Wee *Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands. leonard.wee@maastro.nl.
Alberto Traverso *Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands. alberto.traverso@maastro.nl.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLMaastricht University · NLCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData shortage is a common challenge in developing computer-aided diagnosis systems. We developed a generative adversarial network (GAN) model to generate synthetic lung lesions mimicking ground glass nodules (GGNs).

methodsWe used 216 computed tomography images with 340 GGNs from the Lung Image Database Consortium and Image Database Resource Initiative database. A GAN model retrieving information from the whole image and the GGN region was built. The generated samples were evaluated with visual Turing test performed by four experienced radiologists or pulmonologists. Radiomic features were compared between real and synthetic nodules. Performances were evaluated by area under the curve (AUC) at receiver operating characteristic analysis. In addition, we trained a classification model (ResNet) to investigate whether the synthetic GGNs can improve the performances algorithm and how performances changed as a function of labelled data used in training.

resultsOf 51 synthetic GGNs, 19 (37%) were classified as real by clinicians. Of 93 radiomic features, 58 (62.4%) showed no significant difference between synthetic and real GGNs (p ≥ 0.052). The discrimination performances of physicians (AUC 0.68) and radiomics (AUC 0.66) were similar, with no-significantly different (p = 0.23), but clinicians achieved a better accuracy (AUC 0.74) than radiomics (AUC 0.62) (p < 0.001). The classification model trained on datasets with synthetic data performed better than models without the addition of synthetic data.

conclusionsGAN has promising potential for generating GGNs. Through similar AUC, clinicians achieved better ability to diagnose whether the data is synthetic than radiomics.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedDatabases, FactualDeep learningLungNeural networks (computer)Solitary pulmonary noduleTomography (x-ray computed)

Identifiers

PMID36447082
PMCPMC9708993
OpenAlexW4310480765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.