ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2023
The diagnostic experience of women with fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency (FXPOI).
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Carrier screening in the reproductive setting-Are there medical implications for the heterozygote?-A guide for clinicians.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Improving women's healthcare providers' knowledge about fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency through a novel educational tool.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Women's healthcare providers' knowledge and practices surrounding fragile-X associated primary ovarian insufficiency (FXPOI).Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Population-based FMR1 carrier screening among reproductive women.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe fragile X premutation occurs when there are 55-200 CGG repeats in the 5' UTR of the FMR1 gene. An estimated 1 in 148 women carry a premutation, with 20-30% of these individuals at risk for fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency (FXPOI). Diagnostic experiences of FXPOI have not previously been included in the literature, limiting insight on experiences surrounding the diagnosis. This study identifies barriers and facilitators to receiving a FXPOI diagnosis and follow-up care, which can inform care and possibly improve quality of life.
methodsWe conducted qualitative interviews with 24 women with FXPOI exploring how FMR1 screening, physician education, and supportive care impacted their experience. Three subgroups were compared: women diagnosed through family history who have biological children, women diagnosed through family history who do not have biological children, and women diagnosed through symptoms of POI.
resultsThemes from interviews included hopes for broader clinician awareness of FXPOI, clear guidelines for clinical treatment, and proper fertility workups to expand reproductive options prior to POI onset. Participants also spoke of difficulty finding centralized sources of care.
conclusionsOur results indicate a lack of optimal care of women with a premutation particularly with respect to FMR1 screening for molecular diagnosis, short- and long-term centralized treatment, and clinical and emotional support. The creation of a "FXPOI health navigator" could serve as a centralized resource for the premutation patient population, assisting in connection to optimal treatment and appropriate referrals, including genetic counseling, mental health resources, advocacy organizations, and better-informed physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.