Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36446941›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2022

Transverse abdominis plane block compared with patient-controlled epidural analgesia following abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Young Hyun Jeong, Ji-Yoon Jung, Hyeyeon Cho, Hyun-Kyu Yoon, Seong-Mi Yang, Ho-Jin Lee, Won Ho Kim

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Young Hyun JeongDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National Unversity College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Yoon JungDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National Unversity College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Hyeyeon ChoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National Unversity College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Hyun-Kyu YoonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National Unversity College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Seong-Mi YangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National Unversity College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Ho-Jin LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National Unversity College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea.
Won Ho KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National Unversity College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea. wonhokim@snu.ac.kr.
Seoul National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block are used for pain control after abdominal surgery. Although there have been several meta-analyses comparing these two techniques, the conclusion was limited by a small number of studies and heterogeneity among studies. Our meta-analysis used the Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane central library databases from their inception through September 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TEA and TAP block were included. The pre-specified primary outcome was the pain score at rest at 12 h postoperatively. Twenty-two RCTs involving 1975 patients were included. Pooled analyses showed the pain score at rest at 12 h postoperatively was significantly different between groups favoring TEA group (Mean difference [MD] 0.58, 95% confidence interval CI - 0.01, 1.15, P = 0.04, I

Indexed as

Analgesia, EpiduralAnesthesia, EpiduralNerve BlockAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledHumansPostoperative Pain

Identifiers

PMID36446941
PMCPMC9709047
OpenAlexW4310594225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.