ArticleScientific reports2022
Eddy covariance-based differences in net ecosystem productivity values and spatial patterns between naturally regenerating forests and planted forests in China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synergistic analysis of climate and anthropogenic impacts on NPP dynamics in India's Western Ghats using geodetector.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Litter decomposition and nutrient release are faster under secondary forests than under Chinese fir plantations with forest development.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Net ecosystem productivity (NEP), the difference between gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (ER), is the basis of forest carbon sinks. Revealing NEP differences between naturally regenerating forests (NF) and planted forests (PF) can benefit for making carbon neutrality strategies. Based on 35 eddy covariance measurements in China, we analyzed NEP differences in values and spatial patterns between NF and PF. The results showed that NF had slightly lower NEP than PF, resulting from the high stand age (SA) and soil fertilizer, while their differences were not significant (p > 0.05). The increasing latitude decreased mean annual air temperature thus decreased GPP both in NF and PF. However, the higher SA and soil fertilizer in NF made most GPP release as ER thus induced no significant NEP spatial variation, while lower SA and soil fertilizer in PF made NEP spatially couple with GPP thus showed a decreasing latitudinal pattern. Therefore, stand characteristics determined the differences in NEP values but indirectly affected the differences in NEP spatial variations through altering GPP allocation. The decreasing latitudinal pattern of NEP in PF indicates a higher sequestration capacity in the PF of South China. Our results provide a basis for improving the forest carbon sequestration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.