Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36446860›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Fully automated condyle segmentation using 3D convolutional neural networks.

Nayansi Jha, Taehun Kim, Sungwon Ham, Seung-Hak Baek, Sang-Jin Sung, Yoon-Ji Kim, Namkug Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nayansi Jha *Graduate School of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Taehun Kim *Department of Biomedical Engineering, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sungwon HamResearch Strategy Team, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Hak BaekDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Jin SungDepartment of Orthodontics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yoon-Ji KimDepartment of Orthodontics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. yn0331@ulsan.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-7030-569X
Namkug KimDepartment of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. namkugkim@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop an auto-segmentation algorithm for mandibular condyle using the 3D U-Net and perform a stress test to determine the optimal dataset size for achieving clinically acceptable accuracy. 234 cone-beam computed tomography images of mandibular condyles were acquired from 117 subjects from two institutions, which were manually segmented to generate the ground truth. Semantic segmentation was performed using basic 3D U-Net and a cascaded 3D U-Net. A stress test was performed using different sets of condylar images as the training, validation, and test datasets. Relative accuracy was evaluated using dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) and Hausdorff distance (HD). In the five stages, the DSC ranged 0.886-0.922 and 0.912-0.932 for basic 3D U-Net and cascaded 3D U-Net, respectively; the HD ranged 2.557-3.099 and 2.452-2.600 for basic 3D U-Net and cascaded 3D U-Net, respectively. Stage V (largest data from two institutions) exhibited the highest DSC of 0.922 ± 0.021 and 0.932 ± 0.023 for basic 3D U-Net and cascaded 3D U-Net, respectively. Stage IV (200 samples from two institutions) had a lower performance than stage III (162 samples from one institution). Our results show that fully automated segmentation of mandibular condyles is possible using 3D U-Net algorithms, and the segmentation accuracy increases as training data increases.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsNeural Networks, ComputerCone-Beam Computed TomographyExercise TestHumansMandibular Condyle

Identifiers

PMID36446860
PMCPMC9709043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.