ArticleScientific reports2022
Fully automated condyle segmentation using 3D convolutional neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can Deep Learning Methods Differentiate Temporomandibular Joint Disorders From Healthy Joints? A 3D Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Study Based on CBCT Images.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2026Article
- An interactive cascaded deep learning framework with expert refinement for accurate striatal subregion segmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Automated segmentation of the fibula from CT imaging using two-stepped deep learning in 3D U-Net architectures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Mandibular condyle detection using deep learning and double attractor-based energy valley optimizer algorithm.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Machine learning in dentistry and oral surgery: charting the course with bibliometric insights.Head & face medicine · 2025Article
- Improving accuracy for inferior alveolar nerve segmentation with multi-label of anatomical adjacent structures using active learning in cone-beam computed tomography.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Automatic segmentation and visualization of cortical and marrow bone in mandibular condyle on CBCT: a preliminary exploration of clinical application.Oral radiology · 2025Article
- An automated method for assessing condyle head changes in patients with skeletal class II malocclusion based on Cone-beam CT images.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop an auto-segmentation algorithm for mandibular condyle using the 3D U-Net and perform a stress test to determine the optimal dataset size for achieving clinically acceptable accuracy. 234 cone-beam computed tomography images of mandibular condyles were acquired from 117 subjects from two institutions, which were manually segmented to generate the ground truth. Semantic segmentation was performed using basic 3D U-Net and a cascaded 3D U-Net. A stress test was performed using different sets of condylar images as the training, validation, and test datasets. Relative accuracy was evaluated using dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) and Hausdorff distance (HD). In the five stages, the DSC ranged 0.886-0.922 and 0.912-0.932 for basic 3D U-Net and cascaded 3D U-Net, respectively; the HD ranged 2.557-3.099 and 2.452-2.600 for basic 3D U-Net and cascaded 3D U-Net, respectively. Stage V (largest data from two institutions) exhibited the highest DSC of 0.922 ± 0.021 and 0.932 ± 0.023 for basic 3D U-Net and cascaded 3D U-Net, respectively. Stage IV (200 samples from two institutions) had a lower performance than stage III (162 samples from one institution). Our results show that fully automated segmentation of mandibular condyles is possible using 3D U-Net algorithms, and the segmentation accuracy increases as training data increases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.