Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36446859›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Application of Bayesian networks to identify factors influencing acceptability of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in Guilin, China.

Lingmi Zhou, Wuxiang Shi, Sawitri Assanangkornchai, Panupong Vichitkunakorn, Jie Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lingmi Zhou *Department of AIDS Control and Prevention, Guilin Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guilin, 541000, Guangxi, China.
Wuxiang Shi *Health Management Unit, Faculty of Humanities and Management, Guilin Medical University, Guilin, 541004, Guangxi, China.
Sawitri AssanangkornchaiDepartment of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, 90110, Songkhla, Thailand. savitree.a@psu.ac.th.
Panupong VichitkunakornDivision of Computational Science, Faculty of Science, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, 90110, Songkhla, Thailand.
Jie TangDepartment of AIDS Control and Prevention, Guilin Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guilin, 541000, Guangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective strategy to prevent uninfected individuals from contracting human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), however it must be acceptable to stakeholders in order to be effective. This study aimed to assess the acceptability of PrEP and related influencing factors. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among female sex workers (FSW), people who inject drugs (PWID), and men who have sex with men (MSM) using respondent driven sampling. Factors influencing PrEP acceptability were estimated using ordinal logistic regression and Bayesian networks. The survey included 765 eligible participants. The mean score of the perceived acceptability index was 3.9 (SD = 1.97). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed a higher acceptance of PrEP was associated with elder age, having other medical insurance, higher perceived utility of PrEP in facilitating prevention of HIV, higher perceived ease of use, higher perceived risk of increased risk behavior, higher perceived privacy problem in using PrEP, higher perceived comparative advantage over condom use, higher perceived comparative advantage of having sex when the urge arises, and higher perceived image of PrEP user as having sexual risky behavior, as public-minded and as health-conscious. The Bayesian network model showed perceived ease of use, perceived image of user as health-conscious, and perceived comparative advantage of having sex when the urge arises were directly associated with acceptability of PrEP. If these three factors were at a high level, 74.6% of the participants would have a high level of acceptability of PrEP. Effective education strategies to promote the acceptance of PrEP are needed. Implementation strategies should incorporate more inclusive messaging and build positive publicity for PrEP to reduce the stigma that PrEP use indicates risky behavior.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisSexual and Gender MinoritiesSex WorkersAgedBayes TheoremChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHomosexuality, MaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID36446859
PMCPMC9707149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.