Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36446649›Full record

ArticleDental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials2022

Silica infiltration on translucent zirconia restorations: Effects on the antagonist wear and survivability.

Larissa Marcia Martins Alves, Camila da Silva Rodrigues, Nathalia de Carvalho Ramos, Jeff Buizastrow, Tiago Moreira Bastos Campos, Marco Antonio Bottino, Yu Zhang, Renata Marques de Melo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Methodological approaches in graded dental ceramics.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Larissa Marcia Martins AlvesDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, Av. Eng. Francisco José Longo, 777, Jardim São Dimas, 12245-000 São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil; Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University College of Dentistry, 433 1st Ave., New York, NY 10010, United States.
Camila da Silva RodriguesDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, Av. Eng. Francisco José Longo, 777, Jardim São Dimas, 12245-000 São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil; Department of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University College of Dentistry, 433 1st Ave., New York, NY 10010, United States.
Nathalia de Carvalho RamosDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, Av. Eng. Francisco José Longo, 777, Jardim São Dimas, 12245-000 São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Jeff BuizastrowDepartment of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University College of Dentistry, 433 1st Ave., New York, NY 10010, United States.
Tiago Moreira Bastos CamposDepartment of Physics, Aeronautics Technological Institute (ITA), Praça Marechal Eduardo Gomes, 50, 12228-900 São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Marco Antonio BottinoDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, Av. Eng. Francisco José Longo, 777, Jardim São Dimas, 12245-000 São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA 19104, United States.
Renata Marques de MeloDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, Av. Eng. Francisco José Longo, 777, Jardim São Dimas, 12245-000 São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: renata.marinho@fosjc.unesp.br.
Department of Aerospace Science and Technology · BRInstituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica · BRNew York University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Viscoelastic Modeling Aided Experimental Optimization toward Fracture-Resistant Porcelain-Veneered Zirconia and Lithium Disilicate RestorationsR01DE026279 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KIM, JEONGHO, ZHANG, YU · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
Toward novel translucent and strong nanostructured dental zirconiaR01DE026772 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ZHANG, YU · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE026279NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE026772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess potential antagonist wear and survival probability of silica-infiltrated zirconia compared to glass-graded, glazed, and polished zirconia.

methodsTable top restorations made of 3Y-TZP (3Y), 5Y-PSZ (5Y), and lithium disilicate (LD) were bonded onto epoxy resin preparations. Each zirconia was divided into five groups according to the surface treatment: polishing; glaze; polishing-glaze; glass infiltration; and silica infiltration. The LD restorations received a glaze layer. Specimens were subjected to sliding fatigue wear using a steatite antagonist (1.25 ×10

resultsThe survival probability was different among the groups. Silica infiltration and polishing-glaze led to lower volume loss than glaze and glass-infiltration. Difference was observed for roughness among the zirconia and surface treatment, while lithium disilicate presented similar roughness compared to both glazed zirconia. Scanning electron microscopy revealed the removal of the surface treatment after sliding fatigue wear in all groups. Compressive stress was detected on 3Y surfaces, while tensile stress was observed on 5Y. SIGNIFICANCE: 3Y and 5Y zirconia behaved similarly regarding antagonist wear, presenting higher antagonist wear than the glass ceramic. Silica-infiltrated and polished-glazed zirconia produced lower antagonist volume loss than glazed and glass-infiltrated zirconia. Silica-infiltrated 3Y and lithium disilicate restorations were the only groups to show survival probabilities lower than 85%.

Indexed as

GlassSilicon DioxideEpoxy ResinsMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningZirconiumEpoxy ResinsSilicon DioxideZirconiumzirconium oxide3Y-TZP, 5Y-TZP, lithium disilicateCeramicsSliding contactSurface glass infiltrationWear parameters

Identifiers

PMID36446649
PMCPMC9928576
OpenAlexW4310017884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.