Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36446616›Full record

ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2023

[Developing, Evaluating and Implementing Digital Health Interventions Part II - Discussion Paper of the Digital Health Working Group of the German Network for Health Services Research (DNVF)].

Sven Kernebeck, Madlen Scheibe, Monika Sinha, Florian Fischer, Andreas Knapp, Patrick Timpel, Lorenz Harst, Ulrich Reininghaus, Horst Christian Vollmar

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. [Digital Healthcare: Requirements for a Successful Transformation].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Sven KernebeckLehrstuhl für Didaktik und Bildungsforschung im Gesundheitswesen - Fakultät für Gesundheit, Universität Witten Herdecke, Witten, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7098-9748
Madlen ScheibeZentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung, Universitätsklinikum und Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus an der TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Monika SinhaMitglied AG Bioinformatik, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Florian FischerBayerisches Forschungszentrum Pflege Digital, Hochschule Kempten, Kempten, Germany.
Andreas KnappMint Medical GmbH, Heidelberg.ORCID 0000-0001-7095-1977
Patrick TimpelZentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung, Universitätsklinikum und Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus an der TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Lorenz HarstZentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung, Universitätsklinikum und Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus an der TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6004-2670
Ulrich ReininghausDepartment of Public Mental Health, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Manheim, Germany.
Horst Christian VollmarAbteilung für Allgemeinmedizin (AM RUB), Medizinische Fakultät, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0117-7188
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEIGES Institut · DEKempten University of Applied Sciences · DEKing's College London · GBUniversity Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The methodological challenges of evaluating digital interventions (DI) for health services research are omnipresent. The Digital Health Working Group of the German Network for Health Services Research (DNVF) presented and discussed these challenges in a two-part discussion paper. The first part addressed challenges in definition, development and evaluation of DI. In this paper, which represents the second part, the definition of outcomes, reporting of results, synthesis of evidence, and implementation are addressed as methodological challenges of DI. Potential solutions are presented and the need to address these challenges in future research are discussed.

Indexed as

Health Services ResearchGermany

Identifiers

PMID36446616
PMCPMC11248873
OpenAlexW4310345727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.