Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36446409›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2023

Chemotherapy-free treatment of recurrent advanced ovarian cancer: myth or reality?

Cristiana Marques, Filipa Ferreira da Silva, Isabel Sousa, Mónica Nave

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Biological characteristics of spontaneous ovarian cancer inZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Cristiana MarquesCentro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia Espinho EPE, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal.
Filipa Ferreira da SilvaChampalimaud Foundation, Lisboa, Portugal filipa.silva@fundacaochampalimaud.pt.ORCID 0000-0002-8737-0439
Isabel SousaCentro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Portugal.
Mónica NaveHospital da Luz, Lisboa, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced ovarian cancer remains a leading cause of death from gynecologic malignancy. Surgery and, in most cases, platinum-based chemotherapy with or without maintenance with bevacizumab and/or poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) represent the mainstay of treatment, but the disease typically recurs. The treatment of these patients represents a clinical challenge because sequential chemotherapy regimens are often used, with suboptimal outcomes and cumulative toxicity. Chemotherapy-free regimens, based on combinations of PARPi, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors, anti-programmed cell death protein-1/programmed death-ligand 1, and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein-4 antibodies, among others, represent a valid option, with manageable toxicity profile and ease of administration. This review addresses this new strategy in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer and discusses its feasibility in the treatment landscape of the disease.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsBevacizumabCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ABevacizumabVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Agynecologymedical oncologyovarian cancerovarian neoplasmsovary

Identifiers

PMID36446409
PMCPMC10086454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.