SynthesisMedical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre2023
The SCN5A Gene Is a Predictor of Phenotype Severity in Brugada Syndrome: A Comprehensive Literature Review.
Synthesis in Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epigenetic regulation of electromechanical continuity might determine phenotypic heterogeneity in SCN5A mutation carriers in Brugada syndrome.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of resveratrol in inducing adeno-associated virus as a potential definitive therapy for SCN5A mutation in Brugada syndrome: a narrative review.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025Review
- Genomic analysis of an Ecuadorian individual carrying an SCN5A rare variant.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Pathogenic SCN5A Mutation and Thyrotoxicosis-Related Neurological Syndrome: Casual or Causal Relationship?Brain sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this review was to ascertain whether patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) having SCN5A mutations have a more severe clinical phenotype and prognosis than do patients without SCN5A mutations.
methodsA comprehensive Scopus database search was conducted; studies were selected by using Brugada syndrome and SCN5A as keywords for the main query.
resultsThe available literature consistently shows greater electrophysiological abnormalities in patients with BrS having SCN5A-related etiology. These include conduction disorder evidenced by longer QRS, PQ, and His-ventricular interval duration. Novel lines of evidence suggest that SCN5A mutations are predictors of malignant arrhythmic events. In addition, SCN5A-positive patients and their carrier relatives frequently suffer from various abnormal cardiac phenotypes such as sick sinus syndrome and progressive conduction disorder. Rare variants have also been shown to play a role in cases of epilepsy, hyperthyroidism, irritable bowel syndrome, and malignancy.
conclusionIn this review, we show how the SCN5A mutation status predicts phenotypic characteristics and prognosis in patients with BrS. We conclude that SCN5A mutations weakly predict greater malignant arrhythmic event risk in BrS patients. However, SCN5A mutations do not show robust enough associations with severity indicators to be an independent part of current risk stratification strategies. With advancing knowledge of BrS genetics, the integration of data on rare variants of SCN5A and polygenic risk scores could make an impact on clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.