Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36445914›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Prevalence of comorbidities associated with sickle cell disease among non-elderly individuals with commercial insurance-A retrospective cohort study.

Scott D Ramsey, M A Bender, Li Li, Kate M Johnson, Boshen Jiao, Beth Devine, Anirban Basu

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Postoperative Complications in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Scott D RamseyDivision of Public Health Sciences and Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5972-8280
M A BenderDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Li LiDivision of Public Health Sciences and Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Kate M JohnsonDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Boshen JiaoHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Beth DevineThe Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Anirban BasuThe Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy & Economics (CHOICE) Institute, Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
University of Washington · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USHarvard University · USUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

Model for Economic Analysis of Sickle cell cURE (MEASURE)OT3HL152448 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BASU, ANIRBAN · 2019 to 2019
$3.3M
The Cure Sickle Cell Initiative Economic Analysis: An Evaluation of the Costs of Sickle Cell Disease and Potential Health Plan Budget Impacts of Gene Therapy as a New Treatment OptionOT3HL151434 · NHLBI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI RAMSEY, SCOTT D. · 2019 to 2019
$728k
NHLBI NIH HHS OT3 HL151434NHLBI NIH HHS OT3 HL152448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a severe monogenic disease associated with high morbidity and mortality and a disproportionate burden on Black communities. Few population-based studies have examined the prevalence of comorbidities among persons with SCD. We estimated the prevalence of comorbidities experienced by individuals with SCD enrolled in employer-based health insurance plans in the US over their non-elderly lifetimes (0-64 years of age) with a retrospective cohort design using Truven Health MarketScan commercial claims data from 2007-2018. ICD-9/10 codes were used to identify individuals with SCD using a previously published algorithm. For this cohort, comorbidities associated with SCD were identified across 3 age categories (<18, 18-45, 46-64 years-old), based on the CMS Chronic Comorbidities Warehouse or SCD-specific diagnosis codes, when applicable. The total number of SCD patients available for analysis in each age category was 7,502 (<18 years), 10,183 (18-45 years) and 4,459 (46-64 years). Across all ages, vaso-occlusive pain, infections (non-specific), and fever were the most common comorbidities. Vaso-occlusive pain and infection were the most prevalent conditions for persons age <18- and 18-45-year-olds, while in the 46-54-year-old age group, infection and cardiovascular including pulmonary hypertension were most prevalent. Compared to persons <18 years old, the prevalence of vaso-occlusive pain, fever, and acute chest syndrome claims declined in older populations. The comorbidity burden of SCD is significant across all age groups. SCD patients experience comorbidities of age such as chronic pain, cardio-vascular conditions including pulmonary hypertension and renal disease at far higher rates than the general population. Novel disease modifying therapies in development have the potential to significantly reduce the comorbidity burden of SCD.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellChronic PainHypertension, PulmonaryAdolescentAgedComorbidityFeverHumansInsurance, HealthMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36445914
PMCPMC9707783
OpenAlexW4310351932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.