ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2022
Computed tomography with positron emission tomography is more useful in local than systemic infectious process related to cardiac implanted electrotherapy device: a prospective controlled multicenter diagnostic intervention PET-Guidance Trial.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02196753 (Positron Emission Tomography Combined With Computed Tomography), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Positron Emission Tomography Combined With Computed Tomography (PET CT) in Suspected Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device Infection, a Pilot Study - PET Guidance I
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rate-Responsive Cardiac Pacing: Technological Solutions and Their Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assess the diagnostic value of 18-F FDG PET/CT in cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) infections in facilitating diagnostic process and optimizing decision-making process.Study group (n = 21) patients with initial suspected diagnosis of CIED-related infection or fever of unknown origin and patients referred for device removal due to infection. Control group (n = 13) patients with implanted CIED, who underwent PET/CT due to other non-infectious indications and had no data for infectious process in follow-up.PET/CT scan showed pocket infection in 12 patients (including 1 in whom infection was not finally diagnosed-the examination was performed early after the implantation procedure-1.5 months), increased tracer uptake in intravascular lead part in 3 patients, and increased uptake in intracardiac part in 5 patients.We found that sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the diagnosis made by PET/CT in generator pocket infection was 91.7%, 70%, 78.6%, 87.5% and in lead-dependent intracardiac infection 100%, 47.1%, 35.7%, 100% respectively. PET/CT scan enabled reclassification of diagnosis from possible to definite CIED-related infection in 6 out of 9 patients, and to excluded in 3 out of 9.Establishing diagnosis of device related infections may be challenging due to non-specific symptoms. Incorporation of PET/CT scan in the diagnostic schema can improve accuracy and timing of the diagnosis and help to assess the extent of infection. PET/CT is more useful in local than systemic infectious process related to cardiac implanted electrotherapy device.Trial registration Consent of the bioethics committee nr IK-NP.-0021-85/1465/14. Registration in the www.clinicaltrials.gov database: NCT02196753.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.