SynthesisThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2022
Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance derived global longitudinal strain analysis in patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance for therapy monitoring in cardiomyopathies.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Review
- Redefining Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Stratification in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: An Integrative Approach.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Myocardial interstitial fibrosis and subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with obesity: a 3.0 T MRI study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Article
- CMR-Derived Global Longitudinal Strain and Left Ventricular Torsion as Prognostic Markers in Dilated Cardiomyopathy.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
- Long-Term Prognostic Power of Three-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography-Derived Peak Left Atrial Reservoir Global Longitudinal Strain in Healthy Adults-An Analysis from the MAGYAR-Healthy Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Clinical Utility of Left Ventricular Strains in Severe AS: A Pilot Study with Feature-Tracking Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Atrial and Ventricular Strain Imaging Using CMR in the Prediction of Ventricular Arrhythmia in Patients with Myocarditis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Appraising Myocardial Strain and Biomechanics: A Current Overview.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) derived left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) for evaluating dilated cardiomyopathy patients has been addressed in studies with contradictory results. We therefore performed the first systematic review evaluating evidence on the prognostic value of CMR derived LV-GLS for ischaemic (IDCM) and non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NDCM) patients. Systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42020171582) identified studies up to January 2021 that measured LV-GLS for predicting major adverse cardiac events among dilated cardiomyopathy patients. Studies were identified from MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed by two independent reviewers. 2099 studies were screened. Three prospective and three retrospective observational studies comprising of 1758 patients (29% IDCM patients; 71% NDCM patients) with a weighted mean follow up of 3 years (SD = 1 year) were identified. All six studies included mortality in the primary composite outcome. LV-GLS was associated with increase primary composite outcome among mild to moderately impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) IDCM and NDCM patients (> 30%) in univariable and multivariable analysis. Association was lost among severely impaired LVEF patients (< 30%). From sensitivity analysis, LV-GLS showed significant association with death among NDCM patients (HR 1.27; 95% CI 1.10-1.46; p = 0.001; I
Indexed as
Identifiers
36445666What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.