ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2022
Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy and differential diagnosis with physiological right ventricular remodelling in athletes using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in the Differential Diagnosis Between Athlete's Heart and Cardiac Pathology: Current Evidence and Diagnostic Challenges.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Echocardiography in Athletes: the Ever-Evolving Assessment of Physiology Versus Pathology.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- A concise guide of contemporary cardiovascular imaging practices to differentiate athlete's heart in the gray zone.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Exercise Prescription in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: Finding the Right Balance Between Risks and Benefits.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Review
- Differential diagnosis between 'athlete's heart' and cardiomyopathies.The British journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Ventricular volume asymmetry as a novel imaging biomarker for disease discrimination and outcome prediction.European heart journal open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To describe the overlap between structural abnormalities typical of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) and physiological right ventricular adaptation to exercise and differentiate between pathologic and physiologic findings using CMR. We compared CMR studies of 43 patients (mean age 49 ± 17 years, 49% males, 32 genotyped) with a definitive diagnosis of ARVC with 97 (mean age 45 ± 16 years, 61% males) healthy athletes. CMR was abnormal in 37 (86%) patients with ARVC, but only 23 (53%) fulfilled a major or minor CMR criterion according to the TFC. 7/20 patients who did not fulfil any CMR TFC showed pathological finding (RV RWMA and fibrosis in the LV or LV RWMA). RV was affected in isolation in 17 (39%) patients and 18 (42%) patients showed biventricular involvement. Common RV abnormalities included RWMA (n = 34; 79%), RV dilatation (n = 18; 42%), RV systolic dysfunction (≤ 45%) (n = 17; 40%) and RV LGE (n = 13; 30%). The predominant LV abnormality was LGE (n = 20; 47%). 22/32 (69%) patients exhibited a pathogenic variant: PKP2 (n = 17, 53%), DSP (n = 4, 13%) and DSC2 (n = 1, 3%). Sixteen (16%) athletes exceeded TFC cut-off values for RV volumes. None of the athletes exceeded a RV/LV end-diastolic volume ratio > 1.2, nor fulfilled TFC for impaired RV ejection fraction. The majority (86%) of ARVC patients demonstrate CMR abnormalities suggestive of cardiomyopathy but only 53% fulfil at least one of the CMR TFC. LV involvement is found in 50% cases. In athletes, an RV/LV end-diastolic volume ratio > 1.2 and impaired RV function (RVEF ≤ 45%) are strong predictors of pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.