Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36445535›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2022

The "STOP Pain" Questionnaire: using the Plan-Do-Study-Act model to implement a patient-family preferences-informed questionnaire into a pediatric transitional pain clinic.

Catherine Stratton, Jennifer Tyrrell, Rachel Goren, Chitra Lalloo, Lisa Isaac

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catherine StrattonDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, M5G 1X8, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1841-4565
Jennifer TyrrellDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, M5G 1X8, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6079-8347
Rachel GorenDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, M5G 1X8, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7463-2981
Chitra LallooDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, M5G 1X8, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2794-7061
Lisa IsaacDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, M5G 1X8, Toronto, ON, Canada. lisa.isaac@sickkids.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1419-1066

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient engagement is an important tool for quality improvement (QI) and optimizing the uptake of research findings. The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model is a QI tool that encourages ongoing evaluation of clinical care, thus improving various aspects of patient care. Ascertaining pediatric patient priorities for a pain questionnaire in the post-acute, or transitional pain, setting is important to guide clinical care since active engagement with the population of interest can optimize uptake. We used the PDSA model to adapt a chronic pain questionnaire for the pediatric transitional pain setting to reflect pediatric patient and parent/guardian preferences and to form an example of how the PDSA model can be used to improve clinical care through patient engagement.

methodsThis project employed the PDSA model to adapt the pediatric Ontario Chronic Pain Questionnaire for use in the pediatric Transitional Pain Service (pedTPS) setting. Plan: Following reviewing the Ontario Chronic Pain Questionnaire and literature on pain questionnaire development, goal-based questions, questions on pain location, relevant Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS STUDY: Results from the satisfaction survey were analyzed. Act: Using descriptive statistics employing ordinal mixed-models with random effects, ANOVA, and double-blinded qualitative thematic coding, questionnaire preferences were analyzed and the questionnaire was adapted accordingly before implementation into the (pedTPS).

resultsEighty-eight questionnaires and satisfaction surveys were analyzed from 69 respondents (32 patients; 37 parents/guardians). Sixty-six (75.00%) surveys indicated satisfaction with the questionnaire. A combined 77 (87.50%) "strongly agreed" (25/88) or "agreed" (52/88) that the questionnaire language was clear. The application of suggested changes to the questionnaire resulted in four versions across the project timeline, which reflected patient and parent/guardian preferences for questions that reflect the themes, "Story"; "Time-Optimal"; and "Pertinent" ("STOP"). There were no statistically significant differences in satisfaction across the versions due to sample size.

conclusionMost respondents were satisfied with the questionnaire and prefer "STOP" questions. Future studies will focus on testing the questionnaire for validity and reliability across pedTPS populations.

Indexed as

Pain assessmentPatient-engagementPediatric painQuality improvementQuestionnaire developmentTransitional pain

Identifiers

PMID36445535
PMCPMC9708994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.