Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36445483›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2023

When is a postmortem examination carried out? A retrospective analysis of all Swedish deaths 1999-2018.

Fredrik Tamsen, Irina Alafuzoff

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Implementation of post-mortem examinations within a large population-based cohort: results from the Hamburg City Health Study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Ageing-Related Neurodegeneration and Cognitive Decline.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fredrik TamsenDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. fredrik.tamsen@surgsci.uu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5038-7512
Irina AlafuzoffDepartment of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess who is merited an autopsy in Sweden. Data from the Swedish cause of death (COD) registry over a period of 20 years was retrieved and analysed. A multinominal logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the variables that were most strongly associated with the performance of a clinical or forensic autopsy (CA/FA).A definite COD, i.e. a COD based on autopsy findings, was registered in 12.6% of all deceased during the investigated period. In the remaining cases, the COD was presumed by the clinicians. Being male, born in the Nordic region, dying in a private residence, and unnatural death were most strongly associated with the performance of CA/FA. In contrast, being female, dying from dementia, dying at a nursing home, being born outside of Europe, or living in a small city or rural area seldom led to the performance of CA/FA.The above is certainly surprising as an autopsy provides an opportunity to investigate the cause of death, validate clinical diagnoses, detect unexpected aberrations, audit health care, and provide feedback to clinicians to facilitate their continuing education.

Indexed as

AutopsyCause of DeathEuropeFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSwedenAutopsyCause of deathClinical pathologyDementiaEqualityForensic pathologyGender

Identifiers

PMID36445483
PMCPMC9707416
OpenAlexW4310597329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.