Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36445410›Full record

ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2023

A phase 1b single-arm trial of intratumoral oncolytic virus V937 in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced melanoma: results from the CAPRA study.

Ann W Silk, Steven J O'Day, Howard L Kaufman, Jennifer Bryan, Jacqueline T Norrell, Casey Imbergamo, Daniella Portal, Edwin Zambrano-Acosta, Marisa Palmeri, Seymour Fein and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02565992 (Phase I Study of Intratumoral CAVATAK®), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02565992 phase1completednot on this map

Phase I Study of Intratumoral CAVATAK® (Coxsackievirus A21) and Pembrolizumab in Subjects With Advanced Melanoma (VLA-011 CAPRA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorViralyticsRan2015 to 2019Enrolled36ConditionsMelanomaArmsCAVATAK, Pembrolizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Neoadjuvant therapy in skin cancer: current evidence and future perspectives.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Phase Ib Study of Pembrolizumab in Combination with Intratumoral Injection of Clostridium novyi-NT in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Killing the killers: Natural killer cell therapy targeting glioma stem cells in high-grade glioma.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Ann W SilkRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Steven J O'DayJohn Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Howard L KaufmanDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer BryanRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Jacqueline T NorrellRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Casey ImbergamoRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Daniella PortalRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Edwin Zambrano-AcostaRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Marisa PalmeriRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Seymour FeinCNF Pharma, LLC, New City, NY, USA.
Cai WuMerck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Leslie GuerreiroMerck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Daniel MedinaRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Praveen K BommareddyRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Andrew ZlozaRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Bernard A FoxEarle A. Chiles Research Institute in the Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA.
Carmen Ballesteros-MerinoEarle A. Chiles Research Institute in the Providence Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA.
Yixin RenMerck & Co., Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA.
Darren ShafrenImmvirX Pty Ltd, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.
Mark GroseViralytics Limited, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.
Joshua A ViethRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Janice M MehnertRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. janice.mehnert@nyulangone.org.
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USRutgers Cancer Institute of New JerseyRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USJohnson University · USProvidence Portland Medical Center · USBreakthrough T1D · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USRush University Medical Center · USRutgers New Jersey Medical SchoolSaint John's Health Center · USSirtex (Australia) · AUVifor Pharma (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCAPRA (NCT02565992) evaluated Coxsackievirus A21 (V937) + pembrolizumab for metastatic/unresectable stage IIIB-IV melanoma.

methodsPatients received intratumoral V937 on days 1, 3, 5, and 8 (then every 3 weeks [Q3W]) and intravenous pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg Q3W from day 8. Primary endpoint was safety.

resultsMedian time from first dose to data cutoff was 32.0 months. No dose-limiting toxicities occurred; 14% (5/36) of patients experienced grade 3‒5 treatment-related adverse events. Objective response rate was 47% (complete response, 22%). Among 17 responders, 14 (82%) had responses ≥ 6 months. Among 8 patients previously treated with immunotherapy, 3 responded (1 complete, 2 partial). Responses were associated with increased serum CXCL10 and CCL22, suggesting viral replication contributes to antitumor immunity. For responders versus nonresponders, there was no difference in baseline tumor PD-L1 expression, ICAM1 expression, or CD3

conclusionsThese findings suggest responses to this combination may be seen even in patients without a typical "immune-active" microenvironment. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02565992.

Indexed as

MelanomaOncolytic VirusesAnimalsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedGoatsHumansTumor MicroenvironmentAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedpembrolizumabClinical trialMelanomaOncolytic virusPembrolizumabV937

Identifiers

PMID36445410
PMCPMC10198910
OpenAlexW4310206587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.