ArticleJornal brasileiro de nefrologia
Comparison of GFR measurement with a two-blood sample technique using [99mTc]Tc-DTPA vs. creatinine-based equations in potential kidney donors.
Article in Jornal brasileiro de nefrologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimization of flushing strategies to minimize dilution of high-concentration radiopharmaceuticals in intravenous tubing.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Glomerular filtration rate in patients with renal space-occupying masses using combination of SPECTFrontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAccurate determination of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is crucial for selection of kidney donors. Nuclear medicine methods are considered accurate in measuring GFR but are not always easily available. The four-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD4), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), and Full Age Spectrum (FAS) formulas are common equations for estimating GFR and are recommended for initial assessment of kidney donors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of these GFR estimation equations compared with technetium-99m diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid ([99mTc]Tc-DTPA) clearance.
methodsWe compared GFR estimation by [99mTc]Tc-DTPA clearance using a two-blood sample method with estimation by MDRD4, CKD-EPI, and FAS creatinine-based equations in a population of healthy potential kidney donors.
resultsA total of 195 potential kidney donors (68.2% female; mean age 49 years, range 21-75 years) were included in this study. Mean [99mTc]Tc-DTPA measured GFR (mGFR) was 101.5 ± 19.1 mL/min/1.73 m2. All three equations underestimated the GFR value measured by [99mTc]Tc-DTPA (MDRD4: -11.5 ± 18.8 mL/min/1.73 m2; CKD-EPI: -5.0 ± 17.4 mL/min/1.73 m2; FAS: -8.3 ± 17.4 mL/min/1.73 m2). Accuracy within 30% and 10% of the measured GFR value was highest for CKD-EPI.
conclusionThe CKD-EPI equation showed better performance in estimating GFR in healthy potential kidney donors, proving to be a more accurate tool in the initial assessment of kidney donors. However, creatinine-based equations tended to underestimate kidney function. Therefore, GFR should be confirmed by another method in potential kidney donors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.