ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023
Active learning for efficient analysis of high-throughput nanopore data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Potential of Nanopore Technologies in Peptide and Protein Sensing for Biomarker Detection.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Advancing genetic engineering with active learning: theory, implementations and potential opportunities.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Active learning of enhancers and silencers in the developing neural retina.Cell systems · 2025Article
- TDFPS-Designer: an efficient toolkit for barcode design and selection in nanopore sequencing.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Active learning of enhancer and silencer regulatory grammar in photoreceptors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
motivationAs the third-generation sequencing technology, nanopore sequencing has been used for high-throughput sequencing of DNA, RNA, and even proteins. Recently, many studies have begun to use machine learning technology to analyze the enormous data generated by nanopores. Unfortunately, the success of this technology is due to the extensive labeled data, which often suffer from enormous labor costs. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a novel technology that can not only rapidly analyze nanopore data with high-throughput, but also significantly reduce the cost of labeling. To achieve the above goals, we introduce active learning to alleviate the enormous labor costs by selecting the samples that need to be labeled. This work applies several advanced active learning technologies to the nanopore data, including the RNA classification dataset (RNA-CD) and the Oxford Nanopore Technologies barcode dataset (ONT-BD). Due to the complexity of the nanopore data (with noise sequence), the bias constraint is introduced to improve the sample selection strategy in active learning. Results: The experimental results show that for the same performance metric, 50% labeling amount can achieve the best baseline performance for ONT-BD, while only 15% labeling amount can achieve the best baseline performance for RNA-CD. Crucially, the experiments show that active learning technology can assist experts in labeling samples, and significantly reduce the labeling cost. Active learning can greatly reduce the dilemma of difficult labeling of high-capacity nanopore data. We hope active learning can be applied to other problems in nanopore sequence analysis. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The main program is available at https://github.com/guanxiaoyu11/AL-for-nanopore. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.