ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023
dnadna: a deep learning framework for population genetics inference.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Summary statistics and approximate bayesian computation are comparable to convolutional neural networks for inferring times to fixation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Recent advances in methods to characterize archaic introgression in modern humans.Genome research · 2026Review
- A Systematic Review: Deep Learning for Analyzing Genomic Data to Discover Evolutionary Patterns.Scientifica · 2026Review
- Interpreting generative adversarial networks to infer natural selection from genetic data.Genetics · 2024Article
- Harnessing deep learning for population genetic inference.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024Review
- INTERPRETING GENERATIVE ADVERSARIAL NETWORKS TO INFER NATURAL SELECTION FROM GENETIC DATA.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Genome-wide scans for selective sweeps using convolutional neural networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Deep Learning in Population Genetics.Genome biology and evolution · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationWe present dnadna, a flexible python-based software for deep learning inference in population genetics. It is task-agnostic and aims at facilitating the development, reproducibility, dissemination and re-usability of neural networks designed for population genetic data.
resultsdnadna defines multiple user-friendly workflows. First, users can implement new architectures and tasks, while benefiting from dnadna utility functions, training procedure and test environment, which saves time and decreases the likelihood of bugs. Second, the implemented networks can be re-optimized based on user-specified training sets and/or tasks. Newly implemented architectures and pre-trained networks are easily shareable with the community for further benchmarking or other applications. Finally, users can apply pre-trained networks in order to predict evolutionary history from alternative real or simulated genetic datasets, without requiring extensive knowledge in deep learning or coding in general. dnadna comes with a peer-reviewed, exchangeable neural network, allowing demographic inference from SNP data, that can be used directly or retrained to solve other tasks. Toy networks are also available to ease the exploration of the software, and we expect that the range of available architectures will keep expanding thanks to community contributions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: dnadna is a Python (≥3.7) package, its repository is available at gitlab.com/mlgenetics/dnadna and its associated documentation at mlgenetics.gitlab.io/dnadna/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.