Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36444645›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Tree species and genetic diversity increase productivity via functional diversity and trophic feedbacks.

Ting Tang, Naili Zhang, Franca J Bongers, Michael Staab, Andreas Schuldt, Felix Fornoff, Hong Lin, Jeannine Cavender-Bares, Andrew L Hipp, Shan Li and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genotypic diversity alters invasive ability ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Ting Tang *State Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1145-0723
Naili Zhang *College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Franca J BongersState Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Michael StaabEcological Networks, Technical University Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.
Andreas SchuldtForest Nature Conservation, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Felix FornoffNature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0446-7153
Hong LinInstitute of Applied Ecology, School of Food Science, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing, China.
Jeannine Cavender-BaresDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, United States.
Andrew L HippThe Morton Arboretum, Lisle, United States.
Shan LiState Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yu LiangState Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4259-6028
Baocai HanState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Alexandra-Maria KleinChair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Helge BruelheideInstitute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Walter DurkaGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Bernhard SchmidDepartment of Geography, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Keping MaState Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaojuan LiuState Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9292-4432

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Addressing global biodiversity loss requires an expanded focus on multiple dimensions of biodiversity. While most studies have focused on the consequences of plant interspecific diversity, our mechanistic understanding of how genetic diversity within plant species affects plant productivity remains limited. Here, we use a tree species × genetic diversity experiment to disentangle the effects of species diversity and genetic diversity on tree productivity, and how they are related to tree functional diversity and trophic feedbacks. We found that tree species diversity increased tree productivity via increased tree functional diversity, reduced soil fungal diversity, and marginally reduced herbivory. The effects of tree genetic diversity on productivity via functional diversity and soil fungal diversity were negative in monocultures but positive in the mixture of the four tree species tested. Given the complexity of interactions between species and genetic diversity, tree functional diversity and trophic feedbacks on productivity, we suggest that both tree species and genetic diversity should be considered in afforestation.

Indexed as

ForestsTreesBiodiversityEcosystemFeedbackGenetic VariationSoilSoilBEFecologyfunctional diversitygenetic diversityproductivitytrophic feedbacks

Identifiers

PMID36444645
PMCPMC9754634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.