Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36444505›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of cancer2023

The impact of pancreatic cancer screening on life expectancy: A systematic review of modeling studies.

Brechtje D M Koopmann, Amir-Houshang Omidvari, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Djuna L Cahen, Marco J Bruno, Inge M C M de Kok

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Economic evaluations of early detection strategies for pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brechtje D M KoopmannDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5025-5050
Amir-Houshang OmidvariDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5005-8038
Iris Lansdorp-VogelaarDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9438-2753
Djuna L CahenDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6753-4857
Marco J BrunoDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9181-5499
Inge M C M de KokDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9419-0452

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence supporting the effectiveness of pancreatic cancer (PC) screening is scant. Most clinical studies concern small populations with short follow-up durations. Mathematical models are useful to estimate long-term effects of PC screening using short-term indicators. This systematic review aims to evaluate the impact of PC screening on life expectancy (LE) in model-based studies. Therefore, we searched four databases (Embase, Medline, Web-of-science, Cochrane) until 30 May 2022 to identify model-based studies evaluating the impact of PC screening on LE in different risk populations. Two authors independently screened identified papers, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of studies. A descriptive analysis was performed and the impact of screening strategies on LE of different risk groups was reported. Our search resulted in 419 studies, of which eight met the eligibility criteria (mathematical model, PC screening, LE). Reported relative risks (RR) for PC varied from 1 to 70. In higher risk individuals (RR > 5), annual screening (by imaging with 56% sensitivity for HGD/early stage PC) predicted to increase LE of screened individuals by 20 to 260 days. In the general population, one-time PC screening was estimated to decrease LE (2-110 days), depending on the test characteristics and treatment mortality risk. In conclusion, although the models use different and sometimes outdated or unrealistic assumptions, it seems that PC screening in high-risk populations improves LE, and that this gain increases with a higher PC risk. Updated model studies, with data from large clinical trials are necessary to predict the long-term effect of PC screening more accurately.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPancreatic NeoplasmsHumansLife Expectancyhigh-riskmathematical modelpancreatic cancerscreening

Identifiers

PMID36444505
PMCPMC10107819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.