Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36444494›Full record

ReviewGlobal change biology2023

Freshwater mussel conservation: A global horizon scan of emerging threats and opportunities.

David C Aldridge, Isobel S Ollard, Yulia V Bespalaya, Ivan N Bolotov, Karel Douda, Juergen Geist, Wendell R Haag, Michael W Klunzinger, Manuel Lopes-Lima, Musa C Mlambo and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global change biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Distribution, scale, and drivers of mass mortality events in Europe's freshwater bivalves.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bending the curve of global freshwater biodiversity loss: what are the prospects?Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  12. Surviving global change: a review of the impacts of drought and dewatering on freshwater mussels.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

David C AldridgeAquatic Ecology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9067-8592
Isobel S OllardAquatic Ecology Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5807-055X
Yulia V BespalayaN. Laverov Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Arkhangelsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9066-4833
Ivan N BolotovN. Laverov Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Arkhangelsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3878-4192
Karel DoudaDepartment of Zoology and Fisheries, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-7778-5147
Juergen GeistAquatic Systems Biology Unit, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7698-3443
Wendell R HaagSouthern Research Station, Center for Bottomland Hardwoods Research, U.S. Forest Service, Frankfort, Kentucky, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8742-8381
Michael W KlunzingerAustralian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4141-7788
Manuel Lopes-LimaCIBIO/InBIO/BIOPOLIS-Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources, University of Porto, Vairão, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2761-7962
Musa C MlamboDepartment of Freshwater Invertebrates, Albany Museum, Makhanda, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7624-5686
Nicoletta RiccardiCNR Water Research Institute, Verbania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5297-3387
Ronaldo SousaCBMA-Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology, Department of Biology, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5961-5515
David L StrayerCary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6767-4486
Santiago H TorresCentro de Investigaciones y Transferencia Santa Cruz (CONICET, UNPA, UTN), Unidad Académica San Julián, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral, Santa Cruz, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-2118-0739
Caryn C VaughnOklahoma Biological Survey and Department of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3749-836X
Tadeusz ZającInstitute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2048-9205
Alexandra ZieritzSchool of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0305-8270

Funding

Australian National Environmental Science FoundationCorpus Christi CollegeCzech Science Foundation 19-05510SEuropean Cooperation in Science and Technology CA18239Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 2020.03608.CEECINDIOP PANRussian Science Foundation 21-14-00092Russian Science Foundation 21-17-00126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We identified 14 emerging and poorly understood threats and opportunities for addressing the global conservation of freshwater mussels over the next decade. A panel of 17 researchers and stakeholders from six continents submitted a total of 56 topics that were ranked and prioritized using a consensus-building Delphi technique. Our 14 priority topics fell into five broad themes (autecology, population dynamics, global stressors, global diversity, and ecosystem services) and included understanding diets throughout mussel life history; identifying the drivers of population declines; defining metrics for quantifying mussel health; assessing the role of predators, parasites, and disease; informed guidance on the risks and opportunities for captive breeding and translocations; the loss of mussel-fish co-evolutionary relationships; assessing the effects of increasing surface water changes; understanding the effects of sand and aggregate mining; understanding the effects of drug pollution and other emerging contaminants such as nanomaterials; appreciating the threats and opportunities arising from river restoration; conserving understudied hotspots by building local capacity through the principles of decolonization; identifying appropriate taxonomic units for conservation; improved quantification of the ecosystem services provided by mussels; and understanding how many mussels are enough to provide these services. Solutions for addressing the topics ranged from ecological studies to technological advances and socio-political engagement. Prioritization of our topics can help to drive a proactive approach to the conservation of this declining group which provides a multitude of important ecosystem services.

Indexed as

BivalviaEcosystemAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesFresh WaterRiversconservationdiversityecosystem servicesfreshwater musselhorizon scanmussel healththreatsunionid

Identifiers

PMID36444494
PMCPMC10100069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.