Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36444266›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2022

Application of fused deposition modeling (FDM) on bone scaffold manufacturing process: A review.

Rochmad Winarso, P W Anggoro, Rifky Ismail, J Jamari, A P Bayuseno

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rochmad WinarsoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Muria Kudus, Indonesia.
P W AnggoroDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Industrial Technology University of Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Rifky IsmailDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Indonesia.
J JamariDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Indonesia.
A P BayusenoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some of the health issues that are becoming more prevalent each year include bone disease and fractures. Because the natural healing process of bones takes a long time, a bone grafting procedure is required so that the patient's condition can improve rapidly. Because bone grafting procedures such as autographs, allographs, and xenografts have limits, bone replacement is constructed by employing biomaterials in the form of a bone scaffold via additive manufacturing. As a result, fused deposition modeling (FDM) is a proposed technology for the manufacturing process because it is straightforward, capable of producing complex parts and adjustable shapes, and has minimal operational expenses. However, implementing this technique is challenging because of the scarcity of biocompatible and bioactive materials that are suited. This technology has a number of limitations, including a limited variety of biocompatible and bioactive materials, the most appropriate microarchitecture of bone scaffold, and the establishment of printing parameters that can produce bone scaffold with the strongest mechanical properties. This article discusses current advancements in the use of FDM technologies for bone scaffold production.

Indexed as

3D printingBone tissue engineeringFused deposition modelingPorous Scaffold

Identifiers

PMID36444266
PMCPMC9699973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.