ArticleHeliyon2022
Slow hydrolysis of amylose in soluble starch and amylopectin in suspendable starch liberated from non-glutinous rice flour heated with a sorghum extract.
Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Maintaining the physical quality and digestibility of pellet feed through the use of plant-based pellet binder.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2024Article
- Fabrication and Evaluation of Polyvinyl Alcohol/Corn Starch/Patchouli Oil Hydrogel Films Loaded with Silver Nanoparticles Biosynthesized inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polyphenols in plant can interact with amylose and amylopectin in different ways affecting their hydrolysis by α-amylase. Pancreatin liberated starch from non-glutinous rice flour heated with and without an aqueous extract of sorghum seeds, and hydrolyzed the liberated starch. The hydrolysis of the liberated starch was slowed down by the sorghum extract. Then, the liberated starch was fractionated into soluble starch and suspendable starch. In the soluble starch, amylose hydrolysis was slowed down more significantly than amylopectin hydrolysis, and in the suspendable starch, the hydrolysis of amylopectin was slowed down efficiently by the sorghum extract. It is discussed that (i) the slowdown in the former might be due to the binding of sorghum components including procyanidins to amylose, and that (ii) the slowdown in the latter might be due to the complex formation between amylopectin and shorter amylose combined with the sorghum components. The contribution of amylose to the slowdown was supported by the result that the sorghum extract inhibited the starch hydrolysis only slightly in glutinous rice flour, the starch of which was almost composed of amylopectin. It was proposed a possible mechanism of the slowdown of amylopectin hydrolysis in suspendable starch by shorter amylose combined with the sorghum components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.