ArticleInfection and drug resistance2022
Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Activity Against Drug-Resistant
Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of colistin resistance in clinical isolates ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Pooled it
- Global epidemiology of carbapenem-resistantJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Review
- New Antibiotics Against Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria in Lung Transplantation: Clinical Evidence, Safety, and PK/PD Properties.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026Review
- Current and future options for the treatment of serious infections due to carbapenem-resistantClinical microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Systematic Review of Beta-Lactam vs. Beta-Lactam plus Aminoglycoside Combination Therapy in Neutropenic Cancer Patients.Cancers · 2024Review
- Global evaluation of the antibacterial activity of Ceftolozane/Tazobactam against ESBLs-producingTherapeutic advances in infectious diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparator agents tested against Methods: A total of 2038 Gram-negative organisms (376 Results: Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most potent (MIC Conclusion: Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most active β-lactam agent tested against
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.