Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36444209›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2022

Comparing Conventional and Deep Feature Models for Classifying Fundus Photography of Hemorrhages.

Tamoor Aziz, Chalie Charoenlarpnopparut, Srijidtra Mahapakulchai

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tamoor AzizSchool of Information, Computer and Communication Technology, Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Pathum-Thani, Thailand.
Chalie CharoenlarpnopparutSchool of Information, Computer and Communication Technology, Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Pathum-Thani, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-1705-4411
Srijidtra MahapakulchaiDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thammasat University · THKasetsart University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy is an eye-related pathology creating abnormalities and causing visual impairment, proper treatment of which requires identifying irregularities. This research uses a hemorrhage detection method and compares the classification of conventional and deep features. Especially, the method identifies hemorrhage connected with blood vessels or residing at the retinal border and was reported challenging. Initially, adaptive brightness adjustment and contrast enhancement rectify degraded images. Prospective locations of hemorrhages are estimated by a Gaussian matched filter, entropy thresholding, and morphological operation. Hemorrhages are segmented by a novel technique based on the regional variance of intensities. Features are then extracted by conventional methods and deep models for training support vector machines and the results are evaluated. Evaluation metrics for each model are promising, but findings suggest that comparatively, deep models are more effective than conventional features.

Indexed as

Diabetic RetinopathyDiagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalHemorrhageHumansPhotographyProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36444209
PMCPMC9701128
OpenAlexW4281862428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.