Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36444101›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2022

How theory can help to understand the potential impact of food environment policies on socioeconomic inequalities in diet: an application of Bourdieu's capital theory and the scarcity theory.

Sanne K Djojosoeparto, Carlijn B M Kamphuis, Janas M Harrington, Anne Lene Løvhaug, Gun Roos, Alexia D M Sawyer, Karien Stronks, Laura Terragni, Liv Elin Torheim, Stefanie Vandevijvere and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sanne K DjojosoepartoDepartment of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Carlijn B M KamphuisDepartment of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Janas M HarringtonSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Anne Lene LøvhaugDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, OsloMet-Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Gun RoosConsumption Research Norway (SIFO), OsloMet-Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Alexia D M SawyerDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Karien StronksDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laura TerragniDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, OsloMet-Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Liv Elin TorheimDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, OsloMet-Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Stefanie VandevijvereService of Lifestyle and Chronic Diseases, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Maartje P PoelmanChair Group Consumption and Healthy Lifestyles, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Frank J van LentheDepartment of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Government policies that promote healthy food environments are considered promising to reduce socioeconomic inequalities in diet. Empirical evidence of effects on these inequalities, however, is relatively scarce and, with a few exceptions, tends to be inconclusive. We use two contemporary theories that help to understand socioeconomic inequalities in health and health-related behaviours (Bourdieu's capital theory and Mullainathan and Shafir's scarcity theory) to reason how policies influencing food environments may differentially impact lower and higher socioeconomic groups. In essence, these theories enable us to understand how specific elements of broader daily living conditions (e.g. social practices that lead to habitus formation, material conditions that shape experiences of scarcity) may lead to a greater benefit of certain food environment policies for the healthfulness of diets of lower or higher socioeconomic groups. We conclude that the application of theories on the mechanisms underlying socioeconomic inequalities in health can help to guide future empirical studies in testing theory-based hypotheses on differential effects of policies, and thereby enhance the development of effective policies tackling socioeconomic inequalities in dietary intakes.

Indexed as

DietNutrition PolicyFoodHealth BehaviorHumansSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID36444101
PMCPMC9706114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.