Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36444100›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2022

What we know about the actual implementation process of public physical activity policies: results from a scoping review.

Sarah Forberger, Lucia A Reisch, Biljana Meshkovska, Karolina Lobczowska, Daniel A Scheller, Janine Wendt, Lara Christianson, Jennifer Frense, Jürgen M Steinacker, Catherine B Woods and 2 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Taking a partnership approach to embed physical activity in local policy and practice: a Bradford District case study.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sarah ForbergerLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Lucia A ReischLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Biljana MeshkovskaInstitute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Karolina LobczowskaDepartment of Psychology in Wroclaw, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw, Poland.
Daniel A SchellerDivision of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Janine WendtDivision of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Lara ChristiansonLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Jennifer FrenseLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Jürgen M SteinackerDivision of Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Catherine B WoodsSchool of Health and Human Performance, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Aleksandra LuszczynskaDepartment of Psychology in Wroclaw, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw, Poland.
Hajo ZeebLeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology-BIPS, Bremen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical inactivity rates have remained high worldwide since 2001. Public policies are an essential upstream lever to target individual physical activity (PA) behaviour. However, implementers have different strategies and face implementation challenges that are poorly understood. The present study analyzes the implementation processes of public policies to promote PA in terms of: (i) the policies covered and their legal quality, (ii) the actors and stakeholders involved in the implementation process and (iii) the used implementation strategies (vertical, horizontal or a mix).

methodsA scoping review was systematically conducted (registered Open Science Framework: osf.io/7w84q/), searching 10 databases and grey literature until March 2022. Of the 7741 titles and abstracts identified initially, 10 studies were included.

resultsThe current evidence includes high-income countries (USA, n = 7; UK, New Zealand and Oman, n = 1 each). Policy areas covered are education (school sector) and PA promotion in general (national PA plans or city-wide approaches). The legal classification ranges from laws (school sector) to coordination and budgeting to non-legally binding recommendations. The jurisdictions covered were federal (n = 4), state (n = 1), county (n = 1), school district (n = 1) and city (n = 3). Implementation strategies for city-wide approaches are characterized by a coordinated approach with vertical and horizontal integration; federal PA policies by a mix of implementation strategies; and the school sector by a strict horizontal top-down integration without the involvement of other actors.

conclusionImplementation strategies differ by policy field. Therefore, continuous evaluation of the implementation process is necessary to align policy implementation with policy goals to promote individual PA behaviour.

Indexed as

ExercisePublic PolicyEducational StatusHumansSchoolsSedentary Behavior

Identifiers

PMID36444100
PMCPMC9706118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.