Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36443916›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of animal ecology2023

A trait-based framework for dung beetle functional ecology.

Indradatta deCastro-Arrazola, Nigel R Andrew, Matty P Berg, Alva Curtsdotter, Jean-Pierre Lumaret, Rosa Menéndez, Marco Moretti, Beatrice Nervo, Elizabeth S Nichols, Francisco Sánchez-Piñero and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of animal ecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 12 institutions in 11 countries.

Indradatta deCastro-ArrazolaGermans Cabot Franciscans 48, Bunyola, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6558-5730
Nigel R AndrewInsect Ecology Lab, Natural History Museum, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2850-2307
Matty P BergDepartment of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8442-8503
Alva CurtsdotterInsect Ecology Lab, Natural History Museum, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6870-7924
Jean-Pierre LumaretUniversité Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2926-3974
Rosa MenéndezLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9997-5809
Marco MorettiBiodiversity and Conservation Biology, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5845-3198
Beatrice NervoDepartment of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0512-9079
Elizabeth S NicholsDepartment of Ecology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4960-6842
Francisco Sánchez-PiñeroDepartamento de Zoología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9852-8318
Ana M C SantosTerrestrial Ecology Group (TEG-UAM), Departamento de Ecología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9197-792X
Kimberly S SheldonDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3215-2223
Eleanor M SladeAsian School of the Environment, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-6108-1196
Joaquín HortalDepartment of Biogeography and Global Change, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8370-8877
Universidad de Granada · ESUniversity of New England · AULancaster University · GBNanyang Technological University · SGSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research · CHUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversité Paul-Valéry Montpellier · FRUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversity of Lisbon · PTUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · USUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traits are key for understanding the environmental responses and ecological roles of organisms. Trait approaches to functional ecology are well established for plants, whereas consistent frameworks for animal groups are less developed. Here we suggest a framework for the study of the functional ecology of animals from a trait-based response-effect approach, using dung beetles as model system. Dung beetles are a key group of decomposers that are important for many ecosystem processes. The lack of a trait-based framework tailored to this group has limited the use of traits in dung beetle functional ecology. We review which dung beetle traits respond to the environment and affect ecosystem processes, covering the wide range of spatial, temporal and biological scales at which they are involved. Dung beetles show trait-based responses to variation in temperature, water, soil properties, trophic resources, light, vegetation structure, competition, predation and parasitism. Dung beetles' influence on ecosystem processes includes trait-mediated effects on nutrient cycling, bioturbation, plant growth, seed dispersal, other dung-based organisms and parasite transmission, as well as some cases of pollination and predation. We identify 66 dung beetle traits that are either response or effect traits, or both, pertaining to six main categories: morphology, feeding, reproduction, physiology, activity and movement. Several traits pertain to more than one category, in particular dung relocation behaviour during nesting or feeding. We also identify 136 trait-response and 77 trait-effect relationships in dung beetles. No response to environmental stressors nor effect over ecological processes were related with traits of a single category. This highlights the interrelationship between the traits shaping body-plans, the multi-functionality of traits, and their role linking responses to the environment and effects on the ecosystem. Despite current developments in dung beetle functional ecology, many knowledge gaps remain, and there are biases towards certain traits, functions, taxonomic groups and regions. Our framework provides the foundations for the thorough development of trait-based dung beetle ecology. It also serves as an example framework for other taxa.

Indexed as

ColeopteraEcosystemAnimalsBiodiversityEcologyPlantsSeedsSoilSoilecosystem engineersecosystem processeseffect traitsmultifunctionalityresponse traitsScarabaeoideatrait-function relationships

Identifiers

PMID36443916
PMCPMC10099951
OpenAlexW4310206875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.