Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36443915›Full record

ReviewJournal of advanced nursing2023

Communication with mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units: A concept analysis.

Marte-Marie Wallander Karlsen, Anna Holm, Monica Evelyn Kvande, Pia Dreyer, Judith Ann Tate, Lena Günterberg Heyn, Mary Beth Happ

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of advanced nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marte-Marie Wallander KarlsenDepartment for postgraduate studies, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0492-8821
Anna HolmDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2582-4984
Monica Evelyn KvandeDepartment for postgraduate studies, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4384-4695
Pia DreyerDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3581-7438
Judith Ann TateCenter of Healthy Aging, Self-Management and Complex Care, The Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5050-419X
Lena Günterberg HeynCenter for Health and Technology, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1279-2650
Mary Beth HappCenter of Healthy Aging, Self-Management and Complex Care, The Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4199-2643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe aim of this study was to perform a concept analysis of communication with mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units and present a preliminary model for communication practice with these patients.

designThe Im & Meleis approach for concept analysis guided the study. SEARCH

methodsA literature search was performed in January 2022 in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, psycINFO and Scopus, limited to 1998-2022. The main medical subject headings search terms used were artificial respiration, communication and critical care. The search resulted in 10,698 unique references. REVIEW

methodsAfter a blinded review by two authors, 108 references were included. Core concepts and terminology related to communication with mechanically ventilated patients were defined by content analytic methods. The concepts were then grouped into main categories after proposing relationships between them. As a final step, a preliminary model for communication with mechanically ventilated patients was developed.

resultsWe identified 39 different phrases to describe the mechanically ventilated patient. A total of 60 relevant concepts describing the communication with mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care were identified. The concepts were categorized into five main categories in a conceptual map. The preliminary model encompasses the unique communication practice when interacting with mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care units.

conclusionHighlighting different perspectives of the communication between mechanically ventilated patients and providers through concept analysis has contributed to a deeper understanding of the phenomena and the complexity of communication when the patients have limited possibilities to express themselves. IMPACT: A clear definition of concepts is needed in the further development of guidelines and recommendations for patient care in intensive care, as well as in future research. The preliminary model will be tested further. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution, as this is a concept analysis of previous research.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsRespiration, ArtificialCommunicationCritical CareHumanscommunicationconcept analysiscritical careliterature reviewnon-verbal communicationnursingpatient comfortquality of health caresocial theory

Identifiers

PMID36443915
PMCPMC10099624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.