Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36443880›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2022

The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) as a tool to screen for depression in people with multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional validation study.

Emily Beswick, Suzanne Quigley, Pamela Macdonald, Sarah Patrick, Shuna Colville, Siddharthan Chandran, Peter Connick

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07741864 (Effectiveness of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Pain Management in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07741864 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Pain Management in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Universitario Virgen MacarenaRan2026 to 2027Enrolled84ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Pain, Pain ManagementArmsMindfulness-based intervention, Educational intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily BeswickCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Suzanne QuigleyCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Pamela MacdonaldCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Sarah PatrickThe School of Medicine & Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Shuna ColvilleCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Siddharthan ChandranCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Peter ConnickCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland. pconnick@exseed.ed.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_EX_MR/N50192X/1The Anne Rowling Neurology Clinic No specific grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression has a point prevalence of 25% and lifetime prevalence of 50% in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Due to accessibility and brevity, the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) may be a useful tool in clinical practice for screening and monitoring of depressive symptoms in people with MS (pwMS).

methodsThe objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability, validity and acceptability of the PHQ-9 as a screening tool for depressive symptoms in pwMS. PwMS completed online questionnaires at 3 time-points over 4-weeks. The PHQ-9, Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), Centre for Disease Control Health-Related Quality of Life Measure (CDC-HQOL-4) and clinical history.

results103 participants completed the PHQ-9 at three time points, 43% were categorised as depressed on at least one response. The PHQ-9 exhibited high internal reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.89), and test-re-test agreement (ICC 0.89, 95% CI 0.85-0.91). Convergent validity was indicated through positive correlation with the mental health items on the MSIS-29 (r = 0.46 and r = 0.50) and CDC-HQOL-4 (r = 0.79 and r = 0.73) at both assessment points. Positive correlations between the PHQ-9 and the MSIS-29 (r = 0.86 and r = 0.84) and CDC-HQOL-4 (r = 0.55 and r = 0.37) physical symptom sub-scores did not indicate divergent validity. 93% of ratings evaluated the PHQ-9 as "Very" or "Completely" acceptable.

conclusionThe PHQ-9 is a reliable and valid measure of depressive symptoms in people with MS. Given its accessibility, ease of administration, and acceptability, we recommend the PHQ-9 as a tool to screen for depressive symptoms in people with MS.

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisPatient Health QuestionnaireCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionHumansQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsDepressionMultiple sclerosisReliabilityResponsivenessScreeningValidity

Identifiers

PMID36443880
PMCPMC9706934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.