Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36443860›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2022

Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 (YFAS 2.0) and modified YFAS 2.0 (mYFAS 2.0): Rasch analysis and differential item functioning.

Mohsen Saffari, Chia-Wei Fan, Yen-Ling Chang, Po-Ching Huang, Serene En Hui Tung, Wai Chuen Poon, Chien-Ching Lin, Wen-Chi Yang, Chung-Ying Lin, Marc N Potenza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A meta-analysis assessing reliability of the Yale Food Addiction Scale: Implications for compulsive eating and obesity.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Mohsen Saffari *Health Research Center, Life Style Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Chia-Wei Fan *Department of Occupational Therapy, AdventHealth University, Orlando, FL, USA.
Yen-Ling Chang *Department of Family Medicine, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan.
Po-Ching HuangInstitute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Rd., East Dist., Tainan, 701401, Taiwan.
Serene En Hui TungDivision of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Sciences, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, 57000, Malaysia.
Wai Chuen PoonSunway Business School, Sunway University, No. 5, Jalan Universiti, 47500, Bandar Sunway, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia.
Chien-Ching LinDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wen-Chi YangInfinite Power, Lt. Co., No. 38, Yonghe 1st St., Renwu Dist., Kaohsiung, 814, Taiwan. wenchi890079@gmail.com.
Chung-Ying LinInstitute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Rd., East Dist., Tainan, 701401, Taiwan. cylin36933@gmail.com.
Marc N PotenzaDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
National Cheng Kung University · TWAdventist University of Health Sciences · USBaqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences · IRCardinal Tien Hospital · TWConnecticut Mental Health Center · USInternational Medical University · MYNational Taiwan University · TWSunway University · MYTaiwan Power (Taiwan) · TW

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 110-2410-H-006-115NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood addiction (FA) is a prevalent concern that may manifest as poorly controlled food consumption and promote overweight/obesity. Thus, having a well-established instrument for assessment may facilitate better prevention and treatment. The current study investigated the psychometric properties of two common measures of FA (i.e., the Yale Food Addiction Scale [YFAS] 2.0 and its modified version, mYFAS 2.0) using a robust statistical analysis (Rasch model).

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, the scales were sent to 974 students studying in higher education (60% females) in Taiwan through online media including email and social networks. Rasch modeling was used to assess dimensionality, difficulty level, and item misfit and hierarchy. Differential item functioning (DIF) was performed to examine consistency of the items across gender and weight status.

resultsRasch analysis indicated 3 items of the 35 items belonging to the YFAS 2.0 (8.6%) and none belonging to the mYFAS 2.0 were misfit. Unidimensionality and construct validity of both scales were supported by appropriate goodness-of-fit for diagnostic criteria. The person separation was 3.14 (reliability = 0.91) for the YFAS 2.0 and 2.17 (reliability = 0.82) for mYFAS 2.0, indicating the scales could distinguish participants into more than 3 strata. Only one substantial DIF was found for diagnostic criteria of "Failure to fulfill major role obligation" in the YFAS 2.0 across gender.

conclusionAccording to Rasch modeling, both the YFAS 2.0 and mYFAS 2.0 have acceptable construct validity in Chinese-speaking youth. Scoring methods using either diagnostic criteria or symptom counts for both the YFAS 2.0 and mYFAS 2.0 are supported by the present Rasch findings.

Indexed as

Addictive behaviorsDifferential item functioningFood addictionRaschValidityYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID36443860
PMCPMC9703721
OpenAlexW4310117629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.