Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36443809›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2022

Duration of infertility and assisted reproductive outcomes in non-male factor infertility: can use of ICSI turn the tide?

Liting Zhang, He Cai, Wei Li, Li Tian, Juanzi Shi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Liting ZhangThe Assisted Reproduction Center, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Affiliated With Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
He CaiThe Assisted Reproduction Center, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Affiliated With Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Wei LiThe Assisted Reproduction Center, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Affiliated With Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Li TianThe Assisted Reproduction Center, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Affiliated With Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Juanzi ShiThe Assisted Reproduction Center, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Affiliated With Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China. shijuanziart@126.com.
Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNNorthwest Women's and Children's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is increasingly used among in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles without male factor infertility. For couples with prolonged infertility duration, the preferred insemination method may vary across laboratories and clinics. We analyzed whether ICSI is effective for non-male factor infertility with long infertility duration.

methodsSeventeen thousand four hundred seventy-seven IVF/ICSI cycles from women with non-male factor infertility were included, of these 4177 women with infertility duration ≥ 5 years were in the final analysis. Primary outcome was the live birth rate after first embryo transfer. Secondary outcomes were rates of clinical pregnancy and fertilization.

resultsA nonlinear relationship was observed between infertility duration and IVF fertilization rate, which decreased with infertility years up to the turning point (4.8 years). 4177 women with infertility ≥ 5 years were categorized by IVF (n = 3806) or ICSI (n = 371). Live birth rate after first embryo transfer was 43.02% in ICSI and 47.85% in IVF group (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.72-1.15). Fertilization rate per metaphaseII (aOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.86-1.40) and clinical pregnancy rate (aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.71-1.13) were similar between the two groups. Sensitive analyses (women ≥ 35 years) did not show a benefit of ICSI over IVF.

conclusionsWomen with infertility exceeding 4.8 years had decreased incidence of IVF fertilization. The use of ICSI showed no significant improvement in fertilization and live birth rates for non-male factor couples with ≥ 5 years of infertility.

Indexed as

InfertilitySperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansMalePregnancyReproductionSemenDuration of infertilityFertilizationICSILive birthNon-male factor

Identifiers

PMID36443809
PMCPMC9706853
OpenAlexW4310171908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.