Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36443791›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2022

Canadian critical care nurses experiences on the front lines of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative descriptive study.

Kathleen Gamble, Srinivas Murthy, Sarah L Silverberg, Nina Gobat, Lisa M Puchalski Ritchie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Kathleen GambleLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Knowledge Translation Program, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
Srinivas MurthyDepartment of Pediatrics, BC Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3V4, Canada.
Sarah L SilverbergDepartment of Pediatrics, BC Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3V4, Canada.
Nina GobatNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Lisa M Puchalski RitchieLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Knowledge Translation Program, St. Michael's Hospital, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada. lisa.puchalskiritchie@utoronto.ca.
BC Children's Hospital · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Chair in Pandemic Preparedness Research from the Health Research Foundation and Innovative Medicines Canada na
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent pandemics have provided important lessons to inform planning for public health emergencies. Despite these lessons, gaps in implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic are evident. Additionally, research to inform interventions to support the needs of front-line nurses during a prolonged pandemic are lacking. We aimed to gain an understanding of critical care nurses' perspectives of the ongoing pandemic, including their opinions of their organization and governments response to the pandemic, to inform interventions to improve the response to the current and future pandemics.

methodsThis sub-study is part of a cross-sectional online survey distributed to Canadian critical care nurses at two time points during the pandemic (March-May 2020; April-May 2021). We employed a qualitative descriptive design comprised of three open-ended questions to provide an opportunity for participants to share perspectives not specifically addressed in the main survey. Responses were analyzed using conventional content analysis.

resultsOne hundred nine of the 168 (64.9%) participants in the second survey responded to the open-ended questions. While perspectives about effectiveness of both their organization's and the government's responses to the pandemic were mixed, most noted that inconsistent and unclear communication made it difficult to trust the information provided. Several participants who had worked during previous pandemics noted that their organization's COVID-19 response failed to incorporate lessons from these past experiences. Many respondents reported high levels of burnout and moral distress that negatively affected both their professional and personal lives. Despite these experiences, several respondents noted that support from co-workers had helped them to cope with the stress and challenges.

conclusionOne year into the pandemic, critical care nurses' lived experiences continue to reflect previously identified challenges and opportunities for improvement in pandemic preparedness and response. These findings suggest that lessons from the current and prior pandemics have been inadequately considered in the COVID-19 response. Incorporation of these perspectives into interventions to improve the health system response, and support the needs of critical care nurses is essential to fostering a resilient health workforce. Research to understand the experience of other front-line workers and to learn from more and less successful interventions, and leaders, is needed.

Indexed as

BurnoutCOVID-19Moral distressNursesPandemic preparednessPandemic response

Identifiers

PMID36443791
PMCPMC9706905
OpenAlexW4310190318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.