Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36443789›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2022

Social risks and social needs in a health insurance exchange sample: a longitudinal evaluation of utilization.

Cara C Lewis, Salene M W Jones, Robert Wellman, Adam L Sharp, Laura M Gottlieb, Matthew P Banegas, Emilia De Marchis, John F Steiner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06922188 (Development of Measures to Screen for Financial Hardship in Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06922188 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Development of Measures to Screen for Financial Hardship in Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia

TypeobservationalSponsorFred Hutchinson Cancer CenterRan2025 to 2029Enrolled2,460ConditionsFinancial Hardship, Alzheimer&#39, s Disease (AD), Alzheimer&#39
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Cara C Lewis *Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave Suite 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA. cara.c.lewis@kp.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8920-8075
Salene M W Jones *Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Robert WellmanKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave Suite 1600, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Adam L SharpResearch and Evaluation Department, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Laura M GottliebCenter for Health and Community, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Matthew P BanegasKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR, USA.
Emilia De MarchisDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
John F SteinerInstitute of Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Denver, CO, USA.
Kaiser Permanente · USKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · US

Funding

Kaiser Permanente National Community Health The Social Needs Network for EvaluationKaiser Permanente National Community Health Translation (SONNET)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth systems are increasingly attempting to intervene on social adversity as a strategy to improve health care outcomes. To inform health system efforts to screen for social adversity, we sought to explore the stability of social risk and interest in assistance over time and to evaluate whether the social risk was associated with subsequent healthcare utilization.

methodsWe surveyed Kaiser Permanente members receiving subsidies from the healthcare exchange in Southern California to assess their social risk and desire for assistance using the Accountable Health Communities instrument. A subset of initial respondents was randomized to be re-surveyed at either three or six months later.

resultsA total of 228 participants completed the survey at both time points. Social risks were moderate to strongly stable across three and six months (Kappa range = .59-.89); however, social adversity profiles that included participants' desire for assistance were more labile (3-month Kappa = .52; 95% CI = .41-.64 & 6-month Kappa = .48; 95% CI = .36-.6). Only housing-related social risks were associated with an increase in acute care (emergency, urgent care) six months after initial screening; no other associations between social risk and utilization were observed.

conclusionsThis study suggests that screening for social risk may be appropriate at intervals of six months, or perhaps longer, but that assessing desire for assistance may need to occur more frequently. Housing risks were associated with increases in acute care. Health systems may need to engage in screening and referral to resources to improve overall care and ultimately patient total health.

Indexed as

Health Insurance ExchangesCritical CareHealth FacilitiesHumansMedical AssistancePatient Acceptance of Health CareHealth CareLongitudinalSocial NeedsSocial RiskUtilization

Identifiers

PMID36443789
PMCPMC9703433
OpenAlexW4310184737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.