Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36443788›Full record

Trial reportHealth research policy and systems2022

Effectiveness of a community-integrated intermediary care (CIIC) service model to enhance family-based long-term care for Thai older adults in Chiang Mai, Thailand: a cluster-randomized controlled trial TCTR20190412004.

Myo Nyein Aung, Saiyud Moolphate, Thin Nyein Nyein Aung, Yuka Koyanagi, Akrapon Kurusattra, Sutatip Chantaraksa, Siripen Supakankunti, Motoyuki Yuasa

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health research policy and systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Myo Nyein AungDepartment of Global Health Research, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan. myo@juntendo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8175-6309
Saiyud MoolphateDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Science and Technology, Chiang Mai Rajabhat University, Chiang Mai, 50300, Thailand.
Thin Nyein Nyein AungDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Yuka KoyanagiDepartment of Judo Therapy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tokyo Ariake University of Medical and Health Sciences, Tokyo, 135-0063, Japan.
Akrapon KurusattraDepartment of Health Service Support, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, 11000, Thailand.
Sutatip ChantaraksaDepartment of Health Service Support, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, 11000, Thailand.
Siripen SupakankuntiDepartment of Global Health Research, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
Motoyuki YuasaDepartment of Global Health Research, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
Juntendo University · JPMinistry of Public Health · THChiang Mai Rajabhat University · THChiang Mai University · THChulalongkorn University · THTokyo Ariake University of Medical and Health Sciences · JP

Funding

World Health Organization Centre for Health Development WHO Kobe Centre - WKC: K18020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPopulations around the world are ageing faster, with the majority living in low- and middle-income countries where health and social care are yet to be universal and inclusive for the ageing population. This community-integrated intermediary care (CIIC) model is a novel prevention-based, long-term care model enhancing the family-based care system traditionally practised in Thailand and neighbouring Asian countries, and many low-and middle-income countries globally. This study assessed the effectiveness of the CIIC model in Chiang Mai, Thailand.

methodsThe two-arm parallel intervention study was designed as a cluster-randomized controlled trial. The study population at randomization and analysis was 2788 participants: 1509 in six intervention clusters and 1279 in six control clusters. The research protocol was approved by the WHO Research Ethics Review Committee (WHO/ERC ID; ERC.0003064). The CIIC service intervention model is a combination of formal care and informal care in a subdistrict setting consisting of three components: (1) care prevention delivered as community group exercise and home exercise; (2) care capacity-building of the family caregiver; and (3) community respite service. The primary outcome was family caregivers' burden at 6-month follow-up, and secondary outcome was activities of daily living. Analysis applied the intention-to-treat approach using cluster-level analysis via STATA 16 SE.

resultsBaseline characteristics did not differ between the two arms. Loss of follow up was 3.7%. Mean age of the participants was 69.53 years. Women constituted 60%. The COVID-19 pandemic caused delayed implementation. The proportion of families with reduced caregiver burden at 6-month follow-up was higher among the intervention clusters (mean 39.4%) than control clusters (mean 28.62%). The intervention clusters experienced less functional decline and fewer people with depression.

conclusionsWhen communities are integrated for preventing care, and families are empowered for giving care, it is possible to secure universal access to health and social care for the older persons, with basic resources mobilized from communities. This study had shown the CIIC model as an effective and potential step to the realization of universal health and long-term care coverage being inclusive of ageing populations in Thailand and globally.

trial registrationThis trial was registered at the Thailand Clinical Trial Registry-Trial registration number TCTR20190412004, https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/.

Indexed as

COVID-19Long-Term CareActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansPandemicsThailandAsiaFrailtyGlobal healthHealth promotionImplementation researchPopulation ageingService delivery modelUniversal coverage

Identifiers

PMID36443788
PMCPMC9706835
OpenAlexW4310189602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.