Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36443768›Full record

ReviewHealth research policy and systems2022

In-service training programme for health and social care workers in the Philippines to strengthen interprofessional collaboration in caring for older adults: a mixed-methods study.

Keiko Nakamura, Kathryn Lizbeth L Siongco, T J Robinson T Moncatar, Lourdes Marie S Tejero, Shelley Ann F De La Vega, Sheila R Bonito, Richard Javier, Takako Tsutsui, Tran Dai Tri Han, Man Thi Hue Vo and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health research policy and systems, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Keiko NakamuraDepartment of Global Health Entrepreneurship, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan. nakamura.ith@tmd.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9119-4730
Kathryn Lizbeth L SiongcoDepartment of Global Health Entrepreneurship, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
T J Robinson T MoncatarDepartment of Global Health Entrepreneurship, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Lourdes Marie S TejeroCollege of Nursing, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Shelley Ann F De La VegaInstitute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Sheila R BonitoCollege of Nursing, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Richard JavierDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, College of Public Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Takako TsutsuiUniversity of Hyogo, Kobe, Japan.
Tran Dai Tri HanDepartment of Global Health Entrepreneurship, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Man Thi Hue VoDepartment of Global Health Entrepreneurship, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Yuri TashiroDepartment of Global Health Entrepreneurship, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Saber Al-SobaihiDepartment of Global Health Entrepreneurship, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Kaoruko SeinoDepartment of Global Health Entrepreneurship, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Yushima 1-5-45, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.
Thang Van VoUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Hue, Viet Nam.
Fely Marilyn E LorenzoCommission on Higher Education of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
Carmelita C CanilaDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, College of Public Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.

Funding

World Health Organization WKC:K18017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA growing number of older adults require complex care, but coordination among professionals to provide comprehensive and high-quality care is perceived to be inadequate. Opportunities to gain the knowledge and skills important for interprofessional collaboration in the context of geriatric care are limited, particularly for those already in the workforce. A short-term training programme in interprofessional collaboration for health and social care workers in the Philippines was designed and pilot tested. The programme was devised following a review of the literature about geriatric care education and group interviews about training needs. The objectives of this paper are to introduce the training programme and to evaluate its influence on attitudes and readiness to collaborate among participants using both quantitative and qualitative methodologies.

methodsA total of 42 community health workers and 40 health institution workers participated in the training in July 2019. Quantitative indicators were used to evaluate attitudes towards and readiness for collaboration before and after the training. Content analysis was performed of responses to open-ended questions asking participants to evaluate the training. A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was applied to determine the patterns of similarities or differences between the quantitative and qualitative data.

resultsSignificant improvements were seen in scores on the Attitudes Towards Health Care Teams Scale among community health (P < 0.001) and health institution (P < 0.001) staff after the training. Scenario-based case studies allowed participants to work in groups to practise collaboration across professional and institutional boundaries; the case studies fostered greater collaboration and continuity of care. Exposure to other professionals during the training led to a deeper understanding of current practices among health and social care workers. Use of the scenario-based case studies followed by task-based discussion in groups was successful in engaging care professionals to provide patient-centred care.

conclusionsThis pilot test of in-service training in interprofessional collaboration in geriatric care improved community and health institution workers' attitudes towards such collaboration. A 3-day training attended by health and social care workers from diverse healthcare settings resulted in recommendations to enhance collaboration when caring for older adults in their current work settings.

Indexed as

Inservice TrainingSocial SupportAgedCommunity Health WorkersHealth FacilitiesHumansPhilippinesAttitudes towards health care teamsGeriatric careIn-service trainingInterprofessional collaboration

Identifiers

PMID36443768
PMCPMC9706821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.