Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36443754›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2022

Enterotypical Prevotella and three novel bacterial biomarkers in preoperative stool predict the clinical outcome of colorectal cancer.

Ji-Won Huh, Min Jung Kim, Jaesik Kim, Hyeon Gwon Lee, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Ja-Lok Ku, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park, Dokyoon Kim, Jihyun F Kim and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ji-Won HuhDepartment of Systems Biology, Division of Life Sciences, and Institute for Life Science and Biotechnology, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Min Jung KimDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jaesik KimDepartment of Computer Engineering, Ajou University, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Hyeon Gwon LeeDepartment of Systems Biology, Division of Life Sciences, and Institute for Life Science and Biotechnology, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Bum RyooDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ja-Lok KuCancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Yong JeongDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyu Joo ParkDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dokyoon KimDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Jihyun F KimDepartment of Systems Biology, Division of Life Sciences, and Institute for Life Science and Biotechnology, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. jfk1@yonsei.ac.kr.
Ji Won ParkDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. sowisdom@gmail.com.
Seoul National University · KRYonsei University · KRAjou University · KRUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA significant proportion of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients suffer from early recurrence and progression after surgical treatment. Although the gut microbiota is considered as a key player in the initiation and progression of CRC, most prospective studies have been focused on a particular pathobionts such as Fusobacterium nucleatum. Here, we aimed to identify novel prognostic bacteria for CRC by examining the preoperative gut microbiota through 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing.

resultsWe collected stool samples from 333 patients with primary CRC within 2 weeks before surgery and followed up the patients for a median of 27.6 months for progression and 43.6 months for survival. The sequence and prognosis data were assessed using the log-rank test and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis. The gut microbiota was associated with the clinical outcomes of CRC patients (P

conclusionsThe enterotypical genus Prevotella was demonstrated to be useful in improving CRC prognosis, and combined with the four pathobionts, our hazard score based on the gut microbiota should provide an important asset in predicting medical outcomes for CRC patients. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsPrevotellaBacteriaFecesFusobacterium nucleatumHumansProspective StudiesDysbiosisGut microbiomeMetagenomeMicrobial hazard scoreQIIME

Identifiers

PMID36443754
PMCPMC9703702
OpenAlexW4310213302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.