Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36443748›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Assessment of formats and completeness of paper-based referral letters among urban hospitals in Rwanda: a retrospective baseline study.

Zamzam Kalume, Bart Jansen, Marc Nyssen, Jan Cornelis, Frank Verbeke, Jean Paul Niyoyita

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zamzam KalumeDepartment of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan 2, Brussel, 1050, Belgium. zamzamk@gmail.com.
Bart JansenDepartment of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan 2, Brussel, 1050, Belgium.
Marc NyssenDepartment of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan 2, Brussel, 1050, Belgium.
Jan CornelisDepartment of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan 2, Brussel, 1050, Belgium.
Frank VerbekeDepartment of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan 2, Brussel, 1050, Belgium.
Jean Paul NiyoyitaDepartment of Health Informatics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, PO Box: 3286, Kigali, Rwanda.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BEUniversity of Rwanda · RW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient referral is a process in which a healthcare provider decides to seek assistance due to the limitations of available skills, resources and services offered locally. Paper-based referrals predominantly used in low-income countries hardly follow any procedure. This causes a major gap in communication, coordination, and continuity of care between primary and specialized levels, leading to poor access, delay, duplication and unnecessary costs. The goal of this study is to assess the formats and completeness of existing paper-based referral letters in order to improve health information exchange, coordination, and continuity of care.

methodsA retrospective exploratory research was conducted in eight public and three private healthcare facilities in the city of Kigali from May to October 2021. A purposive sampling method was used to select hospitals and referral letters from patients' files. A data capture sheet was designed according to the contents of the referral letters and the resulting responses were analyzed descriptively.

resultsIn public hospitals, five types of updated referral letters were available, in total agreement with World Health Organization (WHO) standards of which two (neonatal transfer form and patient monitoring transfer form) were not used. There was also one old format that was used by most hospitals and another format designed and used by a district hospital (DH) separately. Three formats were designed and used by private hospitals (PH) individually. A total of 2,304 referral letters were perused and the results show that "external transfer" forms were completed at 58.8%; "antenatal, delivery, and postnatal external transfer" forms at 47.5%; "internal transfer" forms at 46.6%; "Referral/counter referral" forms at 46.0%; district hospital referrals (DH2) at 73.4%. Referrals by private hospitals (PH1, PH2 and PH3) were completed at 97.7%, 70.7%, and 0.0% respectively. The major completeness deficit was observed in counter referral information for all hospitals.

conclusionWe observed inconsistencies in the format of the available referral letters used by public hospitals, moreover some of them were incompatible with WHO standards. Additionally, there were deficits in the completeness of all types of paper-based referral letters in use. There is a need for standardization and to disseminate the national patient referral guideline in public hospitals with emphasis on referral feedback, referral registry, triage, archiving and a need for regular training in all organizations.

Indexed as

Hospitals, PrivateHospitals, UrbanFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesRwandaPatient referralReferral completenessReferral letters

Identifiers

PMID36443748
PMCPMC9706939
OpenAlexW4310118295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.