Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36443728›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Moving from tangibility toward digitalization: investigating team dynamics and facilitator support among medical students in conventional and digital small-group tutorials.

Chia-Ter Chao, Yen-Lin Chiu, Chiao-Ling Tsai, Mong-Wei Lin, Chih-Wei Yang, Chao-Chi Ho, Yen-Yuan Chen, Chiun Hsu, Huey-Ling Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chia-Ter ChaoNephrology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yen-Lin ChiuGraduate Institute of Medical Education and Bioethics, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chiao-Ling TsaiCenter of Faculty Development and Curriculum Integration, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Mong-Wei LinCenter of Faculty Development and Curriculum Integration, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chih-Wei YangGraduate Institute of Medical Education and Bioethics, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chao-Chi HoCenter of Faculty Development and Curriculum Integration, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yen-Yuan ChenGraduate Institute of Medical Education and Bioethics, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chiun HsuCenter of Faculty Development and Curriculum Integration, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan. hsuchiun@ntu.edu.tw.
Huey-Ling ChenGraduate Institute of Medical Education and Bioethics, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan. hueyling@ntu.edu.tw.
National Taiwan University · TWNational Taiwan University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmall group tutorials (SGT) promotes self-directed learning and is widely used in medical education. The coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) has accelerated the trend toward SGT digitalization, with unclear effect. We hypothesize that team dynamics and facilitator support influence SGT satisfaction in digital versus conventional SGT.

methodsDuring the spring semester of year 2021, medical students (the second, third, and fourth year; n = 433) participating in conventional face-to-face and digital SGT curricula were enrolled. Participating students completed the collaborative learning attitude scale (including team dynamics, team acquaintance, and facilitator support dimensions) and teamwork satisfaction scale, previously validated for small-group collaborative learning, and chose preference between conventional or digital SGT in future curricula. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed to extract the essential structural factors of these scales. Paired t-tests were conducted to compare differences in different dimensions and satisfaction between the conventional and digital SGT settings. Two sets of multiple regression analyses were done; one with team satisfaction scale results and the other with preference for digital SGT as the dependent variable were used to evaluate determinants of these two variables.

resultsThe EFA results revealed that the original collaborative learning attitude scale was concentrated on two dimensions: team dynamics and facilitator support. No significant differences were noted between the SGT settings for the two dimensions and teamwork satisfaction. Regression analyses showed that teamwork dynamics was independently correlated with teamwork satisfaction in both conventional and digital SGT. Facilitator support was positively correlated with teamwork satisfaction in conventional, but not digital SGT. Higher teamwork satisfaction was an important determinant of preference for digital SGT among medical students.

conclusionsTeam dynamics were closely linked to teamwork satisfaction among medical students in both conventional and digital SGT, while the role of facilitator support became less obvious during digital SGT.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, MedicalInterdisciplinary PlacementStudents, MedicalCurriculumHumansCollaborative learningFacilitator supportMedical educationOnline educationSmall-group tutorialTeam dynamics

Identifiers

PMID36443728
PMCPMC9703397
OpenAlexW4310212410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.