Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36443721›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Mid-term evaluation of Maternal and Child Nutrition Programme (MCNP II) in Kenya.

Patrick Codjia, Edward Kutondo, Penjani Kamudoni, Judith Munga, Aneesha Ahluwalia, Indrani Sharma, Yvon de Jong, Tom Amolo, Lucy Maina-Gathigi, Victoria Mwenda and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Patrick CodjiaUnited Nations Children's Fund, Dar Es Salaam, TZ, Tanzania.
Edward KutondoUnited Nations Children's Fund, Dar Es Salaam, TZ, Tanzania.
Penjani KamudoniUnited Nations Children's Fund, Dar Es Salaam, TZ, Tanzania.
Judith MungaKenyatta University, Nairobi, KE, Kenya.
Aneesha AhluwaliaIQVIA (India), IN, New Delhi, India.
Indrani SharmaIQVIA (India), IN, New Delhi, India.
Yvon de JongIQVIA, Gouda, NED, Netherlands.
Tom AmoloUnited Nations Children's Fund, Dar Es Salaam, TZ, Tanzania.
Lucy Maina-GathigiUnited Nations Children's Fund, Dar Es Salaam, TZ, Tanzania.
Victoria MwendaUnited Nations Children's Fund, Dar Es Salaam, TZ, Tanzania.
Hemant ChaudhryIQVIA (India), IN, New Delhi, India.
Zipporah BukaniaKenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, KE, Kenya. zbukania@gmail.com.
WWF Tanzania · TZIQVIA (India) · INKenya Medical Research Institute · KEKenyatta University · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKenya is faced with a triple burden of malnutrition which is multi-faceted with health and socio-economic implications. Huge geographical disparities exist, especially, in the arid and semi-arid lands exacerbated by inadequate resource allocation to the nutrition sector and challenges in multi-sectoral coordination and nutrition governance. UNICEF's Maternal and Child Nutrition Programme is a four-year (2018-2022) resilience-building, multi-sectoral program focused on pregnant and lactating women, mothers of children under five years and children under five years. The objective of the mid-term evaluation was to establish the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, and sustainability of the programme.

methodsThe field evaluation conducted between June and July 2021, adopted a concurrent mixed-methods approach, where qualitative information was gathered through 29 key informant interviews and 18 focus group discussions (6 FGDs per population group; women of reproductive age, adolescent girls and men). Quantitatively, data were obtained through desk review of secondary data from programme reports, budgets, and project outputs where descriptive analysis was undertaken using Excel software. Qualitative information was organized using Nvivo software and analyzed thematically.

resultsThe findings provide evidence of the relevance of the Maternal and Child Nutrition Programme II to the nutrition situation in Kenya and its alignment with the Government of Kenya and donor priorities. Most planned programme targets were achieved despite operating in a COVID-19 pandemic environment. The use of innovative approaches such as family mid-upper arm circumference, integrated management of acute malnutrition surge model, Malezi bora and Logistic Management Information Management System contributed to the realization of effective outputs and outcomes. Stringent financial management strategies contributed toward programme efficiencies; however, optimal utilization of the resources needs further strengthening. The programme adopted strategies for strengthening local capacity and promoting ownership and long-term sustainability.

conclusionThe programme is on track across the four evaluation criteria. However, a few suggestions are recommended to improve relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, and sustainability. A formal transition strategy needs to be developed in consultation with multi-stakeholder groups and implemented in phases. UNICEF Nutrition section should explore a more integrated  programming mode of delivery through joint initiatives with other agencies under the Delivery as One UN agenda, along the more gender transformative approaches with more systematic involvement of males and females in gender-based discussions.

Indexed as

COVID-19MalnutritionAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansKenyaLactationMaleMothersPandemicsPregnancyEvaluationMaternal and child nutritionMid-term evaluationNutritionUNICEF

Identifiers

PMID36443721
PMCPMC9702643
OpenAlexW4310114196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.