ArticleBMC health services research2022
The ecology of medical care in Korea: the association of a regular doctor and medical care utilization.
Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Consultation time and communication patterns in outpatient care: an observational study in South Korea.BMC health services research · 2025Observational
- The Ecology of Medical Care in Shanghai: Temporal Trends and International Comparisons.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
- Studies on the ecology of medical care: a comparative analysis in historical perspective, 1928-2018.Salud colectiva · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundsThere is no registered regular doctor system in Korea, but people voluntarily select regular doctors for medical services. This study aims to study the ecology of medical care in Korea according to the presence and type of a regular doctor.
methodsThis study was conducted using Korean Health Panel survey in 2018. The proportion of people who had health problems and received medical care in various settings was analyzed per 1,000 people according to the following groups: without a regular doctor, having a clinic physician as a regular doctor, and having a hospital physician as a regular doctor. The adjusted odds ratio for usage of medical services was calculated.
resultsHealth problems and medical care use increased in the groups in this order: group without a regular doctor, group with a clinic physician as a regular doctor, the group with a hospital physician a regular doctor. Having a hospital physician as a regular doctor was associated with higher odds of inpatient care and emergency room visits, and having a clinic physician as a regular doctor was not associated with odds of inpatient care and emergency room visits when adjusting demographic and health-related variables.
conclusionDepending on whether having a regular doctor and a regular doctor's type, different ecology of medical care was observed. The position and role of a regular doctor in the context of the Korea health care system should be considered from the perspective of primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.