Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36443678›Full record

Trial reportBMC nephrology2022

Artificial neural network - an effective tool for predicting the lupus nephritis outcome.

Jakub Stojanowski, Andrzej Konieczny, Klaudia Rydzyńska, Izabela Kasenberg, Aleksandra Mikołajczak, Tomasz Gołębiowski, Magdalena Krajewska, Mariusz Kusztal

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Application of Machine Learning Models in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jakub Stojanowski *Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.
Andrzej Konieczny *Department of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland. andrzej.konieczny@umw.edu.pl.
Klaudia RydzyńskaDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.
Izabela KasenbergDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.
Aleksandra MikołajczakDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.
Tomasz GołębiowskiDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.
Magdalena KrajewskaDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.
Mariusz KusztalDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Borowska 213, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.
Wroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLupus nephropathy (LN) occurs in approximately 50% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and 20% of them will eventually progress into end-stage renal disease (ESRD). A clinical tool predicting remission of proteinuria might be of utmost importance. In our work, we focused on predicting the chance of complete remission achievement in LN patients, using artificial intelligence models, especially an artificial neural network, called the multi-layer perceptron.

methodsIt was a single centre retrospective study, including 58 individuals, with diagnosed systemic lupus erythematous and biopsy proven lupus nephritis. Patients were assigned into the study cohort, between 1st January 2010 and 31st December 2020, and eventually randomly allocated either to the training set (N = 46) or testing set (N = 12). The end point was remission achievement. We have selected an array of variables, subsequently reduced to the optimal minimum set, providing the best performance.

resultsWe have obtained satisfactory results creating predictive models allowing to assess, with accuracy of 91.67%, a chance of achieving a complete remission, with a high discriminant ability (AUROC 0.9375).

conclusionOur solution allows an accurate assessment of complete remission achievement and monitoring of patients from the group with a lower probability of complete remission. The obtained models are scalable and can be improved by introducing new patient records.

Indexed as

Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicLupus NephritisArtificial IntelligenceHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceEnd-stage renal diseaseLupus nephritisMachine learningProteinuriaSystemic lupus erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID36443678
PMCPMC9706924
OpenAlexW4310190359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.