ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022
Optimal construction of a functional interaction network from pooled library CRISPR fitness screens.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in SEC61G research: from ER translocon subunit to emerging pan-cancer oncogenic roles.Cancer biology & therapy · 2026Review
- A Co-essentiality Network of Cancer Driver Genes Better Prioritizes Anticancer Drugs.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Functional modules predict cancer-relevant genetic interactions in mammalian cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Recharacterization of the Tumor Suppressive Mechanism of RSL3 Identifies the Selenoproteome as a Druggable Pathway in Colorectal Cancer.Cancer research · 2025Article
- BaCoN (Balanced Correlation Network) improves prediction of gene buffering.Molecular systems biology · 2025Article
- Dimensionality reduction methods for extracting functional networks from large-scale CRISPR screens.Molecular systems biology · 2023Article
- Dimensionality reduction methods for extracting functional networks from large-scale CRISPR screens.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- PICKLES v3: the updated database of pooled in vitro CRISPR knockout library essentiality screens.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFunctional interaction networks, where edges connect genes likely to operate in the same biological process or pathway, can be inferred from CRISPR knockout screens in cancer cell lines. Genes with similar knockout fitness profiles across a sufficiently diverse set of cell line screens are likely to be co-functional, and these "coessentiality" networks are increasingly powerful predictors of gene function and biological modularity. While several such networks have been published, most use different algorithms for each step of the network construction process.
resultsIn this study, we identify an optimal measure of functional interaction and test all combinations of options at each step-essentiality scoring, sample variance and covariance normalization, and similarity measurement-to identify best practices for generating a functional interaction network from CRISPR knockout data. We show that Bayes Factor and Ceres scores give the best results, that Ceres outperforms the newer Chronos scoring scheme, and that covariance normalization is a critical step in network construction. We further show that Pearson correlation, mathematically identical to ordinary least squares after covariance normalization, can be extended by using partial correlation to detect and amplify signals from "moonlighting" proteins which show context-dependent interaction with different partners.
conclusionsWe describe a systematic survey of methods for generating coessentiality networks from the Cancer Dependency Map data and provide a partial correlation-based approach for exploring context-dependent interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.