ArticleBMC medical research methodology2022
Meta-DiSc 2.0: a web application for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy data.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 23 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 23 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- SAGES-EAES systematic review and meta-analysis for the use of FLIP/impedance planimetry in the surgical work-up and management of GERD, achalasia, and gastroparesis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Accuracy of prognostic scoring tools for ICU triage and mortality among patients in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Pooled it
- Reporting and interpreting meta-analysis software choices: practical guidance for researchers, reviewers, and editors.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Guideline
- Diagnostic value of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of Doppler Sonography of hepatic blood vessels in the detection of significant liver fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of ultrasound · 2026Pooled it
- Machine Learning Prediction Models for Preeclampsia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- MMP-9 as a diagnostic salivary biomarker for early detection of oral cancers: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Accuracy of diagnostic strategies for detecting Schistosoma mansoni infection in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2026Pooled it
- How accurate is preoperative MRI in assessing scaphoid vascularity in patients with scaphoid nonunion? A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Monocyte Distribution Width for Sepsis Diagnosis in the Emergency Department and Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Investigating the association of albuminuria with the incidence of preeclampsia and its predictive capabilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Pooled it
- Risk-stratification tools for emergency department patients with syncope: A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct evidence for SAEM GRACE.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative diagnostic accuracy of different artificial intelligence models for early gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Laboratory-based molecular test alternatives to RT-PCR for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- The serological diagnostic value of EBV-related IgA antibody panels for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of GeneXpert in the diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Narra J · 2024Pooled it
- CTP for the Screening of Vasospasm and Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in Aneurysmal SAH: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Pooled it
- Palliative prognostic scores for survival prediction of cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024Pooled it
- Lever sign test for anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a diagnostic meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of commercially available serological tests for the detection of measles and rubella viruses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2024Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiagnostic evidence of the accuracy of a test for identifying a target condition of interest can be estimated using systematic approaches following standardized methodologies. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies are relatively complex, presenting a challenge for reviewers without extensive statistical expertise. In 2006, we developed Meta-DiSc, a free user-friendly software to perform test accuracy meta-analysis. This statistical program is now widely used for performing DTA meta-analyses. We aimed to build a new version of the Meta-DiSc software to include statistical methods based on hierarchical models and an enhanced web-based interface to improve user experience.
resultsIn this article, we present the updated version, Meta-DiSc 2.0, a web-based application developed using the R Shiny package. This new version implements recommended state-of-the-art statistical models to overcome the limitations of the statistical approaches included in the previous version. Meta-DiSc 2.0 performs statistical analyses of DTA reviews using a bivariate random effects model. The application offers a thorough analysis of heterogeneity, calculating logit variance estimates of sensitivity and specificity, the bivariate I-squared, the area of the 95% prediction ellipse, and the median odds ratios for sensitivity and specificity, and facilitating subgroup and meta-regression analyses. Furthermore, univariate random effects models can be applied to meta-analyses with few studies or with non-convergent bivariate models. The application interface has an intuitive design set out in four main menus: file upload; graphical description (forest and ROC plane plots); meta-analysis (pooling of sensitivity and specificity, estimation of likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratio, sROC curve); and summary of findings (impact of test through downstream consequences in a hypothetical population with a given prevalence). All computational algorithms have been validated in several real datasets by comparing results obtained with STATA/SAS and MetaDTA packages.
conclusionWe have developed and validated an updated version of the Meta-DiSc software that is more accessible and statistically sound. The web application is freely available at www.metadisc.es .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.